Essay name: Bhakti-rasayana by Madhusudana Sarasvati
Author:
Lance Edward Nelson
Affiliation: McMaster University / Religious Studies
This is a study and English translation of the Bhakti-rasayana by Madhusudana Sarasvati (16th century)—one of the greatest and most vigorous exponents of Advaita after Shankara-Acharya who was also a great devotee of Krishna. The Bhaktirasayana attempts to merge non-dualist metaphysics with the ecstatic devotion of the Bhagavata Purana, by asserting that Bhakti is the highest goal of life and by arguinng that Bhakti embodies God within the devotee's mind.
Page 350 of: Bhakti-rasayana by Madhusudana Sarasvati
350 (of 553)
External source: Shodhganga (Repository of Indian theses)
Download the PDF file of the original publication
338
salvation and saving knowledge, even for the devotee who has
taken recourse to God's grace:
The supreme liberation . . . is attained by those who
have cast off all obstacles by contemplation on the
unqualified at the end of their enjoyment of celestial
powers in brahmaloka. This is occasioned by the rise of
knowledge of reality and the cessation of ignorance and
all its effects through the medium of the Vedanta
sayings, which manifest themselves spontaneously by the
Lord's grace, without the necessity of instruction by
the guru and the difficulty of the practice of hearing
(śravana), reflection (manana), and deep meditation
(Ծ徱Բ).36
That the hearing of the "great sentences"
(mahāvākya) is essential even for the bhakta is reaffirmed
in a particularly perplexing passage at GAD 18.65. After
quoting BP 7.5.23-24, the classical source of the nine-fold
"disciplines of the Lord's devotees" (bhāgavata-
dharmas), and then referring his readers back to the BR for
more detailed explanation of those practices, Madhusudana
writes:
Thus constantly having your mind absorbed in Me because
of the arising of attachment to Me through the practice
of the disciplines of the Lord's devotees, you will come
to Me, the Blessed Lord Vāsudeva, i.e., you will attain
Me by the realization of Me produced by the Vedānta
sayings.
Apart from the continuation here of the BR's close
identification of bhagavat and Brahman, these remarks are
completely contrary to the spirit of the author's earlier
work.
