Essay name: Bhakti-rasayana by Madhusudana Sarasvati
Author:
Lance Edward Nelson
Affiliation: McMaster University / Religious Studies
This is a study and English translation of the Bhakti-rasayana by Madhusudana Sarasvati (16th century)âone of the greatest and most vigorous exponents of Advaita after Shankara-Acharya who was also a great devotee of Krishna. The Bhaktirasayana attempts to merge non-dualist metaphysics with the ecstatic devotion of the Bhagavata Purana, by asserting that Bhakti is the highest goal of life and by arguinng that Bhakti embodies God within the devotee's mind.
Page 208 of: Bhakti-rasayana by Madhusudana Sarasvati
208 (of 553)
External source: Shodhganga (Repository of Indian theses)
Download the PDF file of the original publication
196
abstractness of his image of the former, his analysis of the
relation between bhakti and mokᚣa is strikingly similar to
that presented by the Gaudiya Vaiᚣášavas. As we have seen,
the GosvÄmins regard the emancipation of the soul from the
bondage of mÄyÄĹakti as preliminary to the emergence of true
bhakti. The underlying rationale of MadhusĹŤdana's sixth
stage is exactly the same, and it accomplishes a similar
end: overcoming, through realization of the ätman, the
hindrances to devotion imposed by bondage to ordinary
psychophysical existence. The conception of atman is of
course different, but in each case it must be realized in
91 preparation for the highest experience of bhakti.
bhagavat.92
On the principle that mystic realization in its
nirviĹeᚣa ("qualityless") form is much less blissful than
saviĹeᚣa (âqualified") realization, the GosvÄmins regard
union with brahman to be far inferior to the vision of
Again, Madhusudana's analysis of the stages of
bhakti reflects a similar attitude. It suggests what for an
Advaitin is an almost heretical conclusion, namely, that the
nirvikalpaka realization is less, at least experientially
speaking, than the savikalpaka. It is almost as if
Madhusudana has accepted the classical Vaiᚣášava belief that
in Advaitic mokᚣ�, since it is a unitive state, bliss is not
experienced while in bhakti it is experienced so intensely
that the jĂąÄnin must remained unfulfilled unless he too can
