Essay name: Bhakti-rasayana by Madhusudana Sarasvati
Author:
Lance Edward Nelson
Affiliation: McMaster University / Religious Studies
This is a study and English translation of the Bhakti-rasayana by Madhusudana Sarasvati (16th century)—one of the greatest and most vigorous exponents of Advaita after Shankara-Acharya who was also a great devotee of Krishna. The Bhaktirasayana attempts to merge non-dualist metaphysics with the ecstatic devotion of the Bhagavata Purana, by asserting that Bhakti is the highest goal of life and by arguinng that Bhakti embodies God within the devotee's mind.
Page 195 of: Bhakti-rasayana by Madhusudana Sarasvati
195 (of 553)
External source: Shodhganga (Repository of Indian theses)
Download the PDF file of the original publication
183
The
the mind. While discussing this question, Madhusudana again
considers, in passing, the role of scripture in devotional
spirituality, and again it is given a place corresponding to
that which the "great sayings" have in Advaita.
objector remarks that, if the experience of God is inherent,
then the goal of spiritual practice is already accomplished,
no cause (hetu) of this state is required, and scripture
will therefore be useless. Madhusudana answers that
"scripture serves in the acquisition of the form of the
Lord, which in turn prevents the mind's taking on the form
of other objects," and he further specifies that this
experience of God is "generated by scripture" (sästra-
ᲹԲ).62
Note that both the objection and the response
assume that scripture is in some way the cause of the state
of God-realization.
The lack of dependence on the Vedic revelation
suggested here is thoroughly in keeping with the democratic
spirit of the bhakti movements, and equally opposed to
Vedāntic exclusivism. It allows devotion--and through
devotion the highest goal of life--to be accessible to
those, such as women and members of the lower castes, who
are not eligible for Vedic study. This of course raises the
question of adhikara or eligibility for bhakti, which
Madhusudana does not neglect. An important difference
between bhakti and jñāna lies in the qualifications that
