365betÓéÀÖ

Essay name: Bhakti-rasayana by Madhusudana Sarasvati

Author: Lance Edward Nelson
Affiliation: McMaster University / Religious Studies

This is a study and English translation of the Bhakti-rasayana by Madhusudana Sarasvati (16th century)—one of the greatest and most vigorous exponents of Advaita after Shankara-Acharya who was also a great devotee of Krishna. The Bhaktirasayana attempts to merge non-dualist metaphysics with the ecstatic devotion of the Bhagavata Purana, by asserting that Bhakti is the highest goal of life and by arguinng that Bhakti embodies God within the devotee's mind.

Page 132 of: Bhakti-rasayana by Madhusudana Sarasvati

Page:

132 (of 553)


External source: Shodhganga (Repository of Indian theses)


Download the PDF file of the original publication


Warning! Page nr. 132 has not been proofread.

120
through the intervention of Lord Siva himself.16 From the
time of Sridhara, according to De, "a class of mystic-
emotional SamnyÄsins seems to have grown up, who found
nothing inconsistent in their practices of Bhakti with their
belief in Advaita VedÄnta. # 17 This tradition emerges into
the light of history again in the work of Viṣṇu Purt
(fourteenth century), the author of the Bhaktiratnavalt,
anthology of verses from the BP through which that text
first became popular in Bengal. Viṣṇu Purf was a member of
the same order of Samkara monks as Sridhara.
Indeed, in the
closing verses of this work he apologizes for any deviation
he may have made from the teachings of his illustrious
18 predecessor. The influence of this tradition of
devotional Advaita samnyÄsins seems to have reached Caitanya
himself in the late fifteenth or early sixteenth century, in
this case through Iśvara Purf, who was Caitanya's guru, and
Mädhavendra Purf, who was the preceptor of Iśvara and
therefore Caitanya's paramaguru. Both of these figures were
members of Sridhara's order. It is possible, therefore,
that Caitanya's respect for Sridhara was based upon the
recognition of a direct spiritual connection between himself
and the great commentator, mediated by a lineage of gurus in
the Advaitic Purt order. 19
For reasons such as these, De and Elkman believe
that Caitanya may have been less hostile to Advaita than his
followers made him out to be. On this, De writes:

Let's grow together!

I humbly request your help to keep doing what I do best: provide the world with unbiased sources, definitions and images. Your donation direclty influences the quality and quantity of knowledge, wisdom and spiritual insight the world is exposed to.

Let's make the world a better place together!

Like what you read? Help to become even better: