Significance of Anumana inference
Anumana inference is a method of gaining knowledge through reasoning rather than direct observation. In Arthashastra, it involves inferring from observed characteristics. Vaishnavism views it as a process that employs cause, argument, logic, and symbols for indirect understanding. In Vedanta, Anumana inference is recognized as the second means of valid knowledge, focusing on conclusions drawn from observations and reasoning. Each perspective highlights the significance of inference in understanding knowledge beyond mere observation.
Synonyms: Deduction, Conclusion, Reasoning, Inference, Derivation, Assumption, Supposition
The below excerpts are indicatory and do represent direct quotations or translations. It is your responsibility to fact check each reference.
Hindu concept of 'Anumana inference'
Anumana inference in Hinduism is the process of acquiring knowledge through reasoning and indirect observation, utilizing logic, symbols, and arguments to draw conclusions, serving as a second means of valid knowledge.
From: Srila Gurudeva (The Supreme Treasure)
(1) The inference process that utilizes cause, argument, logic, and symbols to understand knowledge indirectly.[1]
From: History of Indian Medicine (and Ayurveda)
(1) The process of deriving conclusions or generalizations based on evidence from direct observations.[2]
The concept of Anumana inference in local and regional sources
Anumana inference is a type of analogical reasoning characterized by the components of a 'side' (paksha), a correlating 'side' (sapaksha), and a 'dharma' (quality or law), essential for drawing conclusions based on observed similarities.
From: History of Science in South Asia
(1) This refers to a form of analogical reasoning, which is equated with the rule of three and involves a 'side' (paksha), a correlate 'side' (sapaksha), and a 'dharma' (quality or law).[3]