365betÓéÀÖ

Buddha-nature (as Depicted in the Lankavatara-sutra)

by Nguyen Dac Sy | 2012 | 70,344 words

This page relates ¡®Chan and the Lankavatara-sutra¡¯ of the study on (the thought of) Buddha-nature as it is presented in the Lankavatara-sutra (in English). The text represents an ancient Mahayana teaching from the 3rd century CE in the form of a dialogue between the Buddha and Bodhisattva Mahamati, while discussing topics such as Yogacara, Buddha-nature, Alayavijnana (the primacy of consciousness) and the Atman (Self).

Go directly to: Footnotes.

2.2. Chan and the ³¢²¹?°ì¨¡±¹²¹³Ù¨¡°ù²¹-²õ¨±³Ù°ù²¹

Among ²Ñ²¹³ó¨¡²â¨¡²Ô²¹ scriptures, the ³¢²¹?°ì¨¡±¹²¹³Ù¨¡°ù²¹-²õ¨±³Ù°ù²¹ and the Diamond ³§¨±³Ù°ù²¹ are the most important textbooks of Chan. It is said that before leaving China, Bodhidharma made a careful recommendation to his heir disciple Huike that the ³¢²¹?°ì¨¡±¹²¹³Ù¨¡°ù²¹-s¨±tra was the scripture in China containing the essential teaching concerning the mind-ground of the °Õ²¹³Ù³ó¨¡²µ²¹³Ù²¹ leading all sentient beings to the truth of Buddhism.[1] This important also event suggests that before Bodhidharma¡®s coming, Chan had its prior theoretical fundamental background in China, and this school closely related to the °Õ²¹³Ù³ó¨¡²µ²¹³Ù²¹garbha literature, especially the ³¢²¹?°ì¨¡±¹²¹³Ù¨¡°ù²¹s¨±tra.

Bodhidharma is said to have received the teaching of the ³¢²¹?°ì¨¡±¹²¹³Ù¨¡°ù²¹-²õ¨±³Ù°ù²¹ directly from Gunabhadra (394¨C468), the second of the four known translators of the ³§¨±³Ù°ù²¹, and the alleged first patriarch of the school. He is also believed to have written a commentary on the ³¢²¹?°ì¨¡±¹²¹³Ù¨¡°ù²¹-²õ¨±³Ù°ù²¹, the Lengqieyaoyi, also known as Damolun.[2]

There are early texts which explicitly associate Bodhidharma with the ³¢²¹?°ì¨¡±¹²¹³Ù¨¡°ù²¹s¨±tra. Daoxuan, for example, in a late recension of his biography of Bodhidharma¡®s successor Huike, has the s¨±tra as a basic and important element of the teachings passed down by Bodhidharma:

¡°In the beginning Dhyana Master Bodhidharma took the four-roll ³¢²¹?°ì¨¡ ³§¨±³Ù°ù²¹, handed it over to Huike, and said: "When I examine the land of China, it is clear that there is only this sutra. If you rely on it to practice, you will be able to cross over the world.¡±[3]

Another early text, the Record of the Masters and Disciples of the ³¢²¹?°ì¨¡±¹²¹³Ù¨¡°ù²¹-²õ¨±³Ù°ù²¹ (ÀãÙ¤ŽŸÙYÓ› Lengqieshiziji) of Jingjue also mentions Bodhidharma in relation to this text. Jingjue¡®s account also makes explicit mention of sitting meditation: ¡°For all those who sat in meditation, Master Bodhidharma also offered expositions of the main portions of the ³¢²¹?°ì¨¡±¹²¹³Ù¨¡°ù²¹-²õ¨±³Ù°ù²¹, which are collected in a volume of twelve or thirteen pages, bearing the title of Teaching of Bodhidharma¡±.[4] In other early texts, the school that would later become known as Chan is sometimes referred to as the ¡°³¢²¹?°ì¨¡±¹²¹³Ù¨¡°ù²¹ school¡± (Lengqiezong ÀãÙ¤×Ú).[5]

Like the doctrinal foundation of Chan that is based on the thought of ¡° A special transmission outside the scriptures and no dependence upon words and letters¡±, the ³¢²¹?°ì¨¡±¹²¹³Ù¨¡°ù²¹-²õ¨±³Ù°ù²¹ also stresses a lack of reliance on words to successfully express the reality:

¡°±õ´Ú, ²Ñ²¹³ó¨¡³¾²¹³Ù¾±, you say that because of the reality of words the objects are, this talk lacks in sense. Words are not known in all the Buddha-lands; words, ²Ñ²¹³ó¨¡³¾²¹³Ù¾±, are an artificial creation. In some Buddha-lands ideas are indicated by looking steadily, in others by gestures, in still others by a frown, by the movement of the eyes, by laughing, by yawning, or by the clearing of the throat, or by recollection, or by trembling.¡±[6]

In contrast to the ineffectiveness of words, the s¨±tra emphasizes the importance of the self-realization that is attained by noble wisdom and occurs when one has an insight into reality as it is. The truth is the state of self-realization and is beyond categories of discrimination and words.

The s¨±tra goes on to outline the ultimate effects of an experience of selfrealization:

¡°°Õ³ó±ð Bodhisattva will become thoroughly conversant with the noble truth of self-realization, will become a perfect master of his own mind, will conduct himself without effort, will be like a gem reflecting a variety of colors, will be able to assume the body of transformation, will be able to enter into the subtle minds of all beings, and, because of his firm belief in the truth of Mind-only, will, by gradually ascending the stages, become established in Buddhahood.¡±[7]

This thought of self-realization in the ³¢²¹?°ì¨¡±¹²¹³Ù¨¡°ù²¹-²õ¨±³Ù°ù²¹ is identical with the teaching of Chan ¡° Seeing into one¡¯s own nature and attaining Buddhahood¡±. The above lines in the ³¢²¹?°ì¨¡±¹²¹³Ù¨¡°ù²¹s¨±tra also highlights the enlightenment or self-realization must issue from one¡®s own inner mind or consciousness, and the Buddhahood cannot be attained by scriptural teaching or by another person¡®s help.

The means of attaining the Buddhahood recommended in the ³¢²¹?°ì¨¡±¹²¹³Ù¨¡°ù²¹-²õ¨±³Ù°ù²¹ is meditation (»å³ó²â¨¡²Ô²¹). Dhy¨¡na as explained in the ³¢²¹?°ì¨¡±¹²¹³Ù¨¡°ù²¹-²õ¨±³Ù°ù²¹ is distinguished into four levels:

The first is practiced by the unlearned (²ú¨¡±ô´Ç±è²¹³¦¨¡°ù¾±°ì²¹), such as the ?°ù¨¡±¹²¹°ì²¹²õ, Pratyekabuddhas, and devotees of the Yoga. They have been instructed in the doctrine of non-¨¡³Ù³¾²¹²Ô, and regarding the world as impermanent, impure, and pain-producing, they persistently follow these thoughts until they realize the ²õ²¹³¾¨¡»å³ó¾± of thought-extinction.[8]

The second »å³ó²â¨¡²Ô²¹ is designated ¡°statement-reviewing¡± (arthapravicaya), by which is meant an intellectual examination of statements or propositions, Buddhist or non-Buddhist, such as ¡°Each object has its individual marks¡±, ¡°°Õ³ó±ðre is no personal ?tman¡±, 'Things are created by an external agency¡¬, or ¡°things are mutually determined¡±; and after the examination of these themes the practicer of this »å³ó²â¨¡²Ô²¹ turns his thought on the non-¨¡³Ù³¾²¹²Ô-ness of things (»å³ó²¹°ù³¾²¹²Ô²¹¾±°ù¨¡³Ù³¾²â²¹) and on the characteristic features of the various stages (²ú³ó¨±³¾¾±) of Bodhisattvaship, and finally in accordance with the sense involved therein he goes on with his contemplative examination.[9]

The third »å³ó²â¨¡²Ô²¹ is called ¡°Attaching oneself to Thatness¡± (³Ù²¹³Ù³ó²¹³Ù¨¡±ô²¹³¾²ú²¹²Ô²¹), whereby one realizes that to discriminate the two forms of non-¨¡³Ù³¾²¹²Ô-ness is still due to an analytical speculation and that when things are truthfully (²â²¹³Ù³ó¨¡²ú³ó¨±³Ù²¹³¾) perceived, no such analysis is possible, for then there obtains absolute oneness only.[10]

The fourth and last is ¡°°Õ²¹³Ù³ó¨¡²µ²¹³Ù²¹-»å³ó²â¨¡²Ô²¹¡±. In this one enters into the stage of Buddhahood where he enjoys a threefold beatitude belonging to the noble understanding of self-realization and performs wonderful deeds for the sake of all sentient beings.[11]

Thus, the ³¢²¹?°ì¨¡±¹²¹³Ù¨¡°ù²¹-²õ¨±³Ù°ù²¹ which was handed over by Bodhidharma to his first disciple Huike is the most important scripture on the doctrinal foundation of Chan. However, because the ³¢²¹?°ì¨¡±¹²¹³Ù¨¡°ù²¹s¨±tra presented a gradual practice of meditation in four levels to attain the Buddhahood, the development of Chan in China, which emphasized sudden enlightenment, naturally did not follow the gradual levels of meditation like Indian fashion as indicated in the ³§¨±³Ù°ù²¹. The four levels of »å³ó²â¨¡²Ô²¹ of the ³¢²¹?°ì¨¡±¹²¹³Ù¨¡°ù²¹-²õ¨±³Ù°ù²¹, therefore, did not favor the Chinese mind. And, instead of the ³¢²¹?°ì¨¡±¹²¹³Ù¨¡°ù²¹-²õ¨±³Ù°ù²¹, the fifth patriarch Hongren has used the Diamond ³§¨±³Ù°ù²¹ to teach and enlighten his heir disciple Huineng as described in the Platform ³§¨±³Ù°ù²¹.

Footnotes and references:

[back to top]

[2]:

Florin Giripescu Sutton, Existence and Enlightenment in the ³¢²¹?°ì¨¡±¹²¹³Ù¨¡°ù²¹s¨±tra, p. 3.

[3]:

Jeffrey L. Broughton, The Bodhidharma Anthology: The Earliest Records of Zen, p. 62.

[4]:

Heinrich Dumoulin, Zen Buddhism: ´¡?²µ³Ü³Ù³Ù²¹°ù²¹²Ô¾±°ì¨¡²â²¹ History, Vol. I: India and China, p. 89.

[5]:

Ibid., p. 52.

[6]:

³¢²¹?°ì¨¡±¹²¹³Ù¨¡°ù²¹-³§¨±³Ù°ù²¹, p. 91.

[7]:

Ibid., p. 39.

[8]:

¶Ù¨©²µ³ó²¹²Ô¾±°ì¨¡²â²¹. Taisho Tripi?aka (CBETA 2011). Suzuki, Essays in Zen Buddhism, Vol. I, p. 94.

[9]:

Ibid., p. 95.

[10]:

¶Ù¨©²µ³ó²¹²Ô¾±°ì¨¡²â²¹. Taisho Tripi?aka (CBETA 2011). Suzuki, Essays in Zen Buddhism, Vol. I, p. 95.

[11]:

Ibid.

Let's grow together!

I humbly request your help to keep doing what I do best: provide the world with unbiased sources, definitions and images. Your donation direclty influences the quality and quantity of knowledge, wisdom and spiritual insight the world is exposed to.

Let's make the world a better place together!

Like what you read? Help to become even better: