365bet娱乐

Sanskrit text, Unicode transliteration and English translation by Ganganath Jha:

啶溹ぞ啶むた啶班�嵿き啶距さ啶多�嵿�� 啶膏ぞ啶�啶距え啷嵿く啶�啶苦い啶� 啶掂ぞ 啶む�囙し啷� 啶膏�傕ぎ啶むぎ啷� 啷�
啶� 啶膏ぞ啶�啶距え啷嵿く啶距え啶� 啶�啷佮�溹�嵿く啶ㄠ�嵿い啷� 啶膏ぞ啶�啶距え啷嵿く啷囙し啷嵿さ啶�啶班ぞ啶｀た 啶灌た 啷� 啷оェ啷┼エ 啷�

j膩tirbh膩va艣ca 蝉腻尘腻苍测补尘iti v膩 te峁�u sa峁僲atam |
na s膩m膩ny膩ni yujyante s膩m膩nye峁�vapar膩峁噄 hi || 1132 ||

Such words are applied to particular universals, as 鈥�箩腻迟颈岣�鈥� (feminine), 鈥�产丑腻惫补岣�鈥� (masculine) and 鈥�蝉腻尘腻苍测补尘鈥� (neuter). nor is it possible for universals to subsist in other universals themselves.鈥�(1132)

 

Kamala艣墨la鈥檚 commentary (tattvasa峁僩rahapa帽jik膩):

鈥�Nor is it possible, etc. etc.鈥�.鈥擝ecause the doctrine (of the other party) is that Universals are devoid of Universals. This has been said on the basis of the doctrine of the 痴补颈艣别峁�i办补蝉.

The 痴补颈测腻办补谤补峁嘺蝉, Grammarians, however regard Universals as subsisting in Universals also; as declared in the following passage鈥斺�楨ven when the object and the Universal are denoted, all words are denotative of the Universal, inasmuch as all things exist in the form of their functions (痴腻办测补辫补诲墨测补, 3.16).鈥擶hat these people mean is as follows:鈥擳he theories laid down in regard to Universals by other philosophers need not necessarily be accepted by Grammarians; as a matter of fact, Universals are inferred from the effects of the functions of the connection between the word and the resultant cognition; and there can he no limit placed upon such Universals. Hence the basis of the term 鈥楿niversals鈥� consists in that Universal which has a common substratum as inferred from the perception of the effects of the said functions. What is meant by the Universal 鈥榚xisting in the form of their functions鈥� is that their special character is restricted by the functions of the word and the resultant Idea.

This theory should be taken as rejected by what has been said (under Text 1131, second line) that 鈥榓ll such Universals should be taken as discarded by the rejection of the Universal itself (in the chapter on Universals).鈥欌赌�(1132)