365bet娱乐

Sanskrit text, Unicode transliteration and English translation by Ganganath Jha:

啶忇い啷囙え啷堗さ 啶掂た啶掂�曕�嵿し啶距そ啶�啶� 啶多が啷嵿う啶椸ぎ啷嵿く啶� 啶ㄠた啶班ぞ啶曕�冟い啶� 啷�
啶多が啷嵿う啶距ぐ啷嵿ぅ啶距じ啶�啷嵿き啶掂�� 啶灌��啶む�嵿ぅ啶� 啶曕�嵿�� 啶掂た啶掂�曕�嵿し啶� 啶曕�嵿�� 啶掂ぞ 啶多�嵿ぐ啷佮い啶苦�� 啷� 啷�啷︵�� 啷�

etenaiva vivak峁Ｄ�'pi 艣abdagamy膩 nir膩k峁泃膩 |
艣abd膩rth膩sambhave h墨ttha峁� kva vivak峁Ｄ� kva v膩 艣ruti岣� || 907 ||

This same argument serves to set aside the 鈥榙esire to speak鈥� as (held to be) cognised through words. when, as shown above, there can be no 鈥榙enotation of words鈥�, how could there be any 鈥榙esire to speak鈥�? Or even the word itself?鈥�(907)

 

Kamala艣墨la鈥檚 commentary (tattvasa峁僩rahapa帽jik膩):

Other people have asserted as follows鈥�,鈥斺�淭he Word brings about the Inference of the desire to speak (of a certain thing), as declared in the statement that 鈥楾here is no other means save the Word of inferring the desire to speak鈥�.鈥濃�擳his is answered in the following鈥擺see verse 907 above]

If the 鈥榙esire to speak鈥� is really held to be appurtenant to the real 鈥業mport of Words鈥�,鈥攖hen it is 鈥榰nproven鈥�; because there can be no 鈥業mport of Words鈥� in the shape of any such thing as 鈥楽pecific Individuality鈥� and the rest. Hence there can be no real 鈥榙esire to speak鈥� of any object; as there is nothing to which the word may be related.

Nor can there be a word denotative of the object; this is what is stated in the words鈥斺��or even the word itself鈥�.鈥斺赌�艢谤耻迟颈鈥� stands for the Word. If the 鈥榙esire to speak鈥�, is what is expressed by the Word, then the Word cannot be applied to any external object; as it would not be expressed, like any other thing.鈥�(907)