365bet娱乐

Sanskrit text, Unicode transliteration and English translation by Ganganath Jha:

啶溹ぞ啶む�嵿く啶距う啷囙ぐ啷嵿え啶苦�冟じ啷嵿さ啶�啶距さ啶む�嵿さ啶�啶�啷佮�曕�嵿い啶� 啶�啷嵿ぐ啶距�曕�嵿お啷嵿ぐ啶曕ぞ啶多た啶むぎ啷� 啷�
啶︵�嵿ぐ啶掂�嵿く啶距う啶�啶� 啶粪ぁ啶班�嵿ぅ啶� 啶�啷� 啶掂た啶︵�嵿く啶ㄠ�嵿い啷� 啶�啶距ぐ啶�啶距ぐ啷嵿ぅ啶苦�曕ぞ啶� 啷� 啷�啷�啷� 啷�
啶囙い啷嵿く啶距�曕�嵿し啶�啶距う啶曕ぞ啶｀ぞ啶︵ぞ啶� 啶�啷嵿ぐ啶距す啷佮ぐ啶距�椸ぎ啶�啶距い啷嵿ぐ啶曕ぞ啶� 啷�
啶︵�嵿ぐ啶掂�嵿く啶距う啶苦お啷嵿ぐ啶むた啶粪�囙ぇ啷嬥そ啶�啶� 啶膏�權�嵿�曕�嵿し啷囙お啷囙ぃ 啶むう啷佮�氞�嵿く啶む�� 啷� 啷�啷�啷� 啷�

j膩ty膩derni岣�svabh膩vatvamayukta峁� pr膩kprak膩艣itam |
dravy膩daya岣� 峁�a岣峚rth膩 ye vidyante p膩ram膩rthik膩岣� || 547 ||
ity膩k峁�ap膩dak膩峁嚹乨膩岣� pr膩hur膩gamam膩trak膩岣� |
dravy膩diprati峁�edho'ya峁� sa峁卥峁�epe峁嘺 taducyate || 548 ||

The followers of 础办峁�a辫腻诲补 (Gautama, 苍补颈测腻测颈办补蝉) and of 碍补峁嚹乨补 (惫补颈艣别峁�i办补蝉) have asserted, solely on the strength of verbal authority, that鈥斺�渢he theory of the universal and such things being formless, set forth previously鈥攃annot be right; because the six categories of 鈥榮ub stance鈥� and the rest do really exist鈥�.鈥擧ence the refutation of these, substance and the rest, is briefly set forth here.鈥�(547-548)

 

Kamala艣墨la鈥檚 commentary (tattvasa峁僩rahapa帽jik膩):

The Introductory verses have spoken of the Doctrine of 鈥業ntervolved Chain of Causation鈥� as 鈥榝ree from such limiting conditions as those of Quality, Substance, Action, Universal, Inherence and so forth In support of this the Author proceeds to examine the 鈥榮ix categories鈥� (of the 痴补颈艣别峁�i办补蝉); tills examination is what is introduced in the following:鈥擺see verses 547-548 above]

鈥淚n one of the earlier chapters, that on the 鈥楶ermanence of Things鈥� (Chapter VIII), it has been asserted (by the Buddhist) that 鈥榯he Universal and such concepts being formless, the momentary character is not attributed to them鈥� (Text 740).鈥擳his cannot be right; because the six categories of Substance, Quality, Action, Universal, Ultimate Individuality and Inherence do really exist鈥�;鈥攕o say the followers of 础办峁�a辫腻诲补 and others. 狈补颈测腻测颈办补蝉 have been called 鈥�膧办峁�a辫腻诲补鈥� because they are the disciples, followers, of 础办峁�a辫腻诲补; and similarly the followers of 碍补峁嚹乨补, the 痴补颈艣别峁�i办补蝉, have been called 鈥�碍腻峁嚹乨补鈥�.

鈥�Solely on the strength of verbal authority鈥�;鈥攊.e. they are dependent upon Verbal Authority only, totally devoid of reason.鈥�(547-548)