Mammogram Screening Uptake among Female Staff at USM, Kelantan
Journal name: The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences
Original article title: Mammogram Screening Uptake and Its Associated Factors among Female Staff in Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kelantan, Malaysia
The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences (MJMS) is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal published online at least six times a year. It covers all aspects of medical sciences and prioritizes high-quality research.
This page presents a generated summary with additional references; See source (below) for actual content.
Original source:
This page is merely a summary which is automatically generated hence you should visit the source to read the original article which includes the author, publication date, notes and references.
Nurul Aizam Mohd Azmi, Juliawati Muhammad, Siti Suhaila Mohd Yusoff, Nik Rosmawati Nik Hussin
The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences:
(A peer-reviewed, open-access journal)
Full text available for: Mammogram Screening Uptake and Its Associated Factors among Female Staff in Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kelantan, Malaysia
Year: 2023 | Doi: 10.21315/mjms2023.30.5.12
Copyright (license): CC BY 4.0
Download the PDF file of the original publication
Summary of article contents:
Introduction
Breast cancer remains a significant health concern worldwide, including Malaysia, where it constitutes a considerable percentage of cancer diagnoses amongst women. Early detection through mammography screening is crucial for improving treatment outcomes and survival rates. Despite the availability of free services, the uptake of mammography among Malaysian women is notably low. This research conducted at the Health Campus of Universiti Sains Malaysia aimed to analyze the prevalence of mammogram screening and the factors influencing this among female staff aged 50 and above.
Key Factor: The Role of Knowledge and Physician Recommendation
The study revealed that the prevalence of mammogram screening among the participating female staff was only 51.9%, suggesting that access and availability alone may not be enough to encourage screening. Notably, the findings highlighted age, previous clinical breast examinations (CBE), physician recommendations, and knowledge about breast cancer as significant factors associated with increased mammogram uptake. Specifically, participants with higher levels of knowledge about breast cancer were more likely to undergo screening, and having received a physician’s recommendation significantly influenced their screening decisions. This underscores the importance of medical professionals in promoting awareness and encouraging screening, which is essential for early detection.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while the mammogram screening services are accessible and free for health staff, the uptake remains suboptimal. The study indicates that enhancing knowledge about breast cancer and ensuring consistent physician interaction can significantly improve screening rates. Future strategies should prioritize educational programs for both health staff and the community to raise awareness about the importance of regular mammogram screenings, thereby aiming to reduce breast cancer morbidity and mortality. Further research is warranted to understand and address the specific barriers contributing to low screening rates, particularly in the context of the continuing impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic.
FAQ section (important questions/answers):
What is the prevalence of mammogram screening among female health staff?
The prevalence of mammogram screening among female staff at Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, was only 51.9%, despite the service being free and readily available.
What factors are associated with mammogram screening uptake?
Significant factors associated with mammogram screening uptake include older age, previous clinical breast examination (CBE), physician recommendations, and higher levels of knowledge regarding breast cancer.
How was the data for the study collected?
Data was collected through a self-administered questionnaire covering sociodemographic information, health beliefs, and knowledge about breast cancer, as well as the Viarad online system for mammogram findings.
What is the role of health staff in breast cancer screening?
Health staff play a crucial role in promoting awareness and encouraging community participation in mammogram screening, which is essential for early detection and better outcomes in breast cancer management.
Glossary definitions and references:
Scientific and Ayurvedic Glossary list for “Mammogram Screening Uptake among Female Staff at USM, Kelantan�. This list explains important keywords that occur in this article and links it to the glossary for a better understanding of that concept in the context of Ayurveda and other topics.
1) Cancer:
Cancer is a significant health concern characterized by the uncontrolled growth of abnormal cells in the body. It remains one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Specific cancers, such as breast cancer, require continuous research to improve early detection, treatment strategies, and how different populations respond to various health interventions, including screening programs like mammography.
2) Study (Studying):
The study referred to is a systematic investigation aimed at understanding the prevalence of mammogram screening and associated factors among female health staff at Universiti Sains Malaysia. It contributes to existing knowledge by collecting and analyzing data that identifies barriers and facilitators to screening, aiding in the development of targeted educational and health promotion interventions.
3) Knowledge:
Knowledge plays a critical role in health behavior, particularly regarding cancer screening. In the context of mammography, understanding risk factors, symptoms, and the importance of regular screenings can empower women to take proactive steps towards their health. Increased awareness and information can significantly enhance screening participation rates among at-risk populations.
4) Table:
Tables in research articles present data clearly and concisely, facilitating the understanding of complex information. They typically summarize study results, demographic characteristics, or statistical analyses of relational data, helping readers quickly grasp key findings and make comparisons between different groups or conditions pertinent to the study's purpose.
5) Pur:
The term poor, particularly in health research, often describes a lack of knowledge, resources, or access to healthcare services that can impede individuals from seeking necessary medical screening, like mammograms. In this study on mammogram screening, those identified with poor knowledge or beliefs about breast cancer are less likely to participate.
6) Family:
Family history is a critical factor in cancer risk assessment. Individuals with a family history of breast cancer may face higher risks due to genetic predispositions. Understanding the familial influence on women's decisions to pursue screening can aid in identifying at-risk groups needing targeted interventions and preventive education.
7) Education:
Education is a crucial determinant in health-related behaviors. Providing adequate education on breast cancer and the importance of mammography screening can significantly improve participation rates. Continuous medical education for health professionals also ensures they remain informed about the latest research and screening guidelines, enabling better patient advocacy.
8) Death:
Death from cancer, particularly breast cancer, emphasizes the urgency of early detection through screening methods like mammography. Understanding mortality rates connected with late diagnoses can drive public health initiatives and encourage timely screening, ultimately aiming to decrease the overall cancer death toll in targeted populations.
9) Perception:
Perception influences health-seeking behaviors significantly. How individuals view the risks associated with breast cancer and the benefits of mammography can determine their likelihood of participating in screening programs. Positive perceptions foster proactive health behaviors, whereas negative perceptions may lead to avoidance, highlighting the need for effective educational strategies.
10) Attending:
Attending refers to participating in healthcare screenings, such as mammography. The decision to attend these screenings is influenced by various factors, including knowledge, medical advice, and personal beliefs. Encouraging attendance through community programs can help improve early detection rates for breast cancer.
11) Campu:
In this context, 'campus' likely refers to the Health Campus of Universiti Sains Malaysia, where the study was conducted. The environment of a health campus provides access to healthcare resources, making it an ideal setting for promoting health awareness and facilitating screening programs for staff and surrounding communities.
12) Rules:
Rules govern medical guidelines and protocols for health screenings. Understanding these rules allows healthcare professionals to implement best practices, ensuring that procedures such as mammography are conducted effectively and ethically while providing patients with accurate information regarding their health needs and screening benefits.
13) Cina:
China is highlighted in the study as a reference point for international comparisons concerning breast cancer screening practices. Research from different countries, including China, can reveal cultural, economic, and systemic differences in screening uptake, underscoring the need for tailored health policies and educational interventions for diverse populations.
14) Nama (Naman, NĂŁman):
Referring to a specific author or researcher in the study, 'Nama' can indicate their contributions to understanding cancer screening behaviors among health staff and enhancing knowledge about breast cancer. The role of individual researchers is crucial in advancing scientific inquiry through published studies.
15) Life:
Life, in the context of healthcare and cancer, reflects the impact that screening and early detection have on life expectancy and quality. Effective breast cancer screening can facilitate early diagnosis, improve prognosis, and ultimately enhance women's lives, making funding and awareness vital for this health initiative.
16) Activity:
Activity in this study refers to health activities like screenings aimed at identifying health issues, specifically breast cancer. Engaging in health-promoting activities is essential in increasing awareness and understanding of prevention strategies, contributing to better health outcomes and awareness among populations targeted for these screenings.
17) Science (Scientific):
Science underpins the evidence-based practices in healthcare. In the context of the study, scientific research informs understanding of mammography screening's effectiveness, guiding public health policies and clinical practices to improve early detection of breast cancer among women.
18) Rampal:
Rampal likely references an author, indicating contributions to the research literature on breast cancer screening and awareness. The inclusion of diverse researchers helps enrich the academic dialogue surrounding effective public health strategies and the importance of health education.
19) Mahmud:
Mahmud may represent a key researcher involved in the study, contributing to the understanding of mammogram screening prevalence in Malaysia. The presence of multiple researchers signifies collaboration in health research, essential for comprehensive studies that consider various factors affecting health outcomes.
20) Indian:
In the context of health research, the term 'Indian' could refer to the population studied or provide insights into cultural attitudes towards breast cancer and screening practices. Understanding different cultural perspectives allows for the development of tailored health initiatives to improve screening uptake across diverse groups.
21) Mishra (Misra):
Misra is likely another author involved in health-related research, contributing to the discourse on cancer screening and awareness. The diverse expertise among researchers helps ensure comprehensive studies that adequately address health behaviors and intervention strategies within different population groups.
22) Sah:
Shah, in this context, could point to a researcher whose work examines factors influencing cancer screening behaviors. The inclusion of various authors enriches the study's insights by integrating multiple perspectives and expertise in addressing health promotion and education in breast cancer screening.
23) Peng:
Likely denoting an author or relevant researcher in the realm of health studies, Peng's work may contribute insights into the relationship between healthcare practices and population health outcomes. Identifying contributors emphasizes the collaborative nature of scientific inquiry in enhancing public health knowledge.
24) Chan:
Chan may be another researcher contributing to the literature on breast cancer screening. Their role helps to develop more effective intervention strategies by analyzing demographic differences in health behaviors, emphasizing the importance of diverse research teams in producing comprehensive health studies.
25) Discussion:
The discussion section of the study encapsulates the implications of the findings, exploring how the results align with existing literature and furthering understanding of mammography screening uptake. It helps interpret data meaningfully, providing context and recommendations for future research and knowledge dissemination to improve healthcare practices.
26) Language:
Language is a vital tool in the dissemination of health knowledge. In the context of this study, clear communication regarding cancer risks, screening importance, and related health information is essential for educational efforts aimed at improving breast cancer awareness and participation in mammogram screening activities.
27) Disease:
Disease, particularly referring to breast cancer, is a critical area of concern within public health. Understanding disease prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes influences health policies and screening guidelines, which ultimately aim to reduce the burden of disease and enhance early detection strategies through effective screening programs.
28) Account:
Account in research indicates how various factors contribute to outcomes, emphasizing the need to consider all dimensions—social, economic, medical—in understanding health behaviors. Recognizing these factors helps in developing a comprehensive approach to improve mammogram screening rates among diverse populations.
29) Reason:
Reasoning in healthcare research involves identifying underlying motivations for health behaviors, such as the decision to participate in screenings. Understanding reasons for low uptake can inform interventions, educational campaigns, and health policies aimed at promoting proactive health management among at-risk populations.
30) Gold (Golden):
Gold in the context of breast cancer screening refers to the benchmark, notably mammography, which is established as the most effective screening method. Recognizing mammography as the gold standard reinforces its importance in early detection, leading to improved health outcomes and reducing breast cancer mortality rates.
31) Post:
Post, in a healthcare context, can refer to actions taken after diagnosis or screening, such as follow-up treatments or support services for individuals diagnosed with cancer. The post-diagnosis phase is critical in ensuring comprehensive care and support for patients, ultimately impacting their health outcomes.
Other Science Concepts:
Discover the significance of concepts within the article: �Mammogram Screening Uptake among Female Staff at USM, Kelantan�. Further sources in the context of Science might help you critically compare this page with similair documents:
Physician, Good knowledge, Family history, Educational programme, Breast cancer, Data collection, Literature review, Physical examination, United States, Early diagnosis, Conflict of interest, Statistical analysis, Socioeconomic status, Research, Data analysis, Age-group, Respondent, Saudi Arabia, Developed countries, Sample size, Early detection, General population, Health Promotion, Cross-sectional study, Simple random sampling, Prevalence rate, COVID-19 Pandemic, Mortality Rate, Response rate, Health facilities, Poor knowledge, Current study, Mean age, Self-administered questionnaire, Level of significance, Risk factor, Asian countries, Systemic Review, Health worker, Pap Smear, Asymptomatic, Benign lesion, Confidence level, Screening uptake, Medical personnel, Logistic regression, Family income, Routine screening, Breast self-examination, Breast screening, Health staff, Awareness campaign, Hospital staff, Early treatment, Lower socioeconomic status, Tertiary Hospital, Questionnaire, Level of Knowledge, Mammography screening, Physician recommendation, Breast cancer screening, Univariate analysis, Health facility, Clinical breast examination, Screening method, Online system, Health care worker, Health professional, Primary care clinic, Continuous Medical Education, Dependent variable, Independent variable, Older age group, Categorical data, Receiver Operating Characteristic, National guideline, Breast cancer mortality, Research tool, Authors contribution, Associated factor, Breast imaging, Malignant lesion.
Concepts being referred in other categories, contexts and sources.
Knowledge, Survival, Palestine.