Essay name: Tilakamanjari of Dhanapala (study)
Author:
Shri N. M. Kansara
Affiliation: Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda / Department of Sanskrit Pali and Prakrit
This is an English study of the Tilakamanjari of Dhanapala, a Sanskrit poem written in the 11th century. Technically, the Tilaka-manjari is classified as a Gadyakavya (鈥減rose-romance鈥�). The author, Dhanapala was a court poet to the Paramara king Munja, who ruled the Kingdom of Malwa in ancient west-central India.
Chapter 15 - The Tilakamanjari as a Prose Poetic work
130 (of 188)
External source: Shodhganga (Repository of Indian theses)
Download the PDF file of the original publication
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
(ii) In H膩sya,e.g., 503 822 啶啶啶洁お啷嵿く啶膏 啶膏す啶距じ啶さ啶︵い, 啶ㄠぐ啷囙え啷嵿う啷嵿ぐ 啶� 啶掂く啶� 啶啷嵿し啶苦ぃ啷� 啶� 啶ざ啶掂 啶�
啶え啷佮し啷嵿く啶距 啷� 啶曕ぅ啶� 啶げ啶距え啶� 啶啶侧ぞ啶ㄠ啶え啷嵿え啶� 啶氞ぞ啶灌ぐ啶距ぎ啶� 啷� 啶ぞ啶ぞ啶氞ぐ啶距 啶栢げ啷� 啶掂く啶 啷�
啶曕た啶え啷囙え 啶︵啶掂た啶溹じ啷嵿く啷堗さ 啶う啶苦ぐ啶� 啶膏啶掂ぞ啶︵じ啷嬥え啷嵿う啶班啶啶ムえ啷囙え 啶ぇ啷嵿く啷囙い啶� 啶掂じ啷嵿い啷佮い啶む啶掂お啷嵿ぐ啶曕ぞ啶多え啷囙え 啷�
( [bh奴yo'pyaso sah膩samavadata, narendra na vaya峁� pak峁峁噊 na pa艣avo na
manu峁膩岣� | katha峁� phal膩ni m奴l膩nyanna峁� c膩har膩ma岣� | p膩p膩car膩岣� khalu vayam |
kimanena dvijasyaiva madir膩 sv膩dasondaryakathanena madhyetara vastutatvaprak膩艣anena |
(] iii) In Santa, e.g.,
504 啶曕啶粪啶｀啶｀啶洁お啶� 啶班啶灌い啶� 啶むぐ啷佮 啶多啶｀啶洁お啷嵿く啷佮お啶氞啶い啷� 啶啶ㄠざ啷嵿啶ㄠ啶︵啶班 啷�
啶囙い啶� 啶掂た啶啶多え啷嵿い啶� 啶膏え啷嵿い啶� 啶膏啶むお啷嵿く啶ㄠ啶む 啶� 啶掂た啶о啶班啶粪 啷むイ
( [k峁峁囜箛o'pi rohati taru岣� 艣墨峁噊'pyupac墨yate puna艣candra岣� |
iti vim峁浥沘nta岣� santa岣� sa峁僼apyante na vidhure峁 ||
(] iv) In Raudra also, e.g.,
505 啶︵啶班啶掂た啶ㄠ啶む, 啶曕啶掂ぞ啶椸い啶� 啶む啶掂ぎ啶苦す 啷� 啶曕た啶� 啶むさ啶距啶え啶曕ぞ啶班啶ぎ啶む啶班啶啶距い啶�, 啷� 啶曕じ啷嵿い-
啶掂ぞ啶膏啶た啶ㄠ啶ㄠぞ啶膏啶む 啷� 啶曕啶� 啶む 啶︵啶班啶い啶苦ぐ啶苦く啶� 啶︵い啷嵿い啶� 啷� 啶灌啶班啶むぞ啶た 啶� 啶むお啶膏啶掂た啶侧啶曕じ啷嵿く 啷�
[durvin墨te, kv膩gat膩 tvamiha | ki峁� tav膩gamanak膩ryamatropaj膩tama, | kasta-
v膩sminn膩ste | kaina te durmatiriya峁� datt膩 | hr墨t膩pi na tapasvilokasya |
] 1 (2) P膩帽c膩l墨 : The P膩帽c膩l墨 R膩ti may contain compounds
of not more than five or six words. The Gu峁嘺s Madhurya (sweet-
ness) and Saukum膩rya (softness ) should predominate therein,
but in any case Ojas (emphatic assertion) and Kanti (dignity
or conspicuous presence of Rasas) must not be present
in it. This manner is very common with Dhanapala and is nor-
mally utilized in the course of delineation of sentiments
like Srigara, V墨ra, Karu峁嘺 and Adbhuta, as in the following
instances :
(i) In S峁沶g膩ra, e.g.,
506 啶むぐ啶苦す啶︵ぞ 啶灌さ啶苦啷嵿啷囙う 啶班ぞ啶啶� 啶い啷嵿ぐ啶粪ぃ啷嵿ぁ啶距ぁ啶啶ぐ啷囙ぃ 啶掂た啶灌た啶むお啶む啶班お啶距ぃ啷�啶�
啶掂ぐ啷嵿し啶距じ啶侧た啶侧お啷傕ぐ啶苦い啶距じ啷� 啶掂た啶侧ぞ啶膏じ啶班じ啷�啶粪 啶ㄠた啶ぎ啶溹啶溹啶� 啶啶啶溹た啶ㄠ啶掂え啶距え啶� 啷� 啶樴え啶оぞ啶班ぞ-
啶た啶掂啶粪啶熰ぎ啷傕ぐ啷嵿い啶じ啷嵿い啶︵ぞ啶氞た啶︵ぐ啷嵿ざ啶ㄠう啷佮啶栢た啶むぞ 啶� 啶︵啶班さ啶苦え啶む 啶い啷嵿げ啷囙う啶距ぐ 啶啶啶曕ぃ啶苦啶�-
啶掂た啶膏ぐ 啶啶� 啶じ啷冟啶ㄠ啶ㄠ啶さ啶ㄠう啷嵿ぐ啷佮ぎ啶距 啷�
[tarihad膩 haviccheda r膩me峁嘺 patra峁峁囜笉膩岣峚mbare峁嘺 vihitapatrap膩峁嚹玽a
var峁Ｄ乻alilap奴rit膩su vil膩sasaras墨峁 nimamajjura mbhojin墨van膩ni | ghanadh膩r膩-
bhiv峁涐梗峁璦m奴rtayastad膩cidar艣anadu岣hit膩 va d奴ravinata岣� patled膩ra mbuka峁噄k膩-
visara majana mas峁沯annupavanadrum膩岣� |
] 503. TM(N), B.50 (23ff.).
505. ibid., p.335(13-16).
/ 504. ibid., p.402(17-18).
/ 506. ibid., p.179(20ff.).
