365bet

Essay name: Paumacariya (critical study)

Author: K. R. Chandra
Affiliation: Research institute of Prakrit, Jainology and Ahimsa Vaishali

This is a critical study of the Paumacariya: the earliest Jain version of Rama's life story, written in Prakrit by Vimalasuri dating to the 4th century AD. In this text, Rama (referred to as Padma) is depicted with lotus-like eyes and a blooming face. The Paumacariya places emphasis on the human aspects of characters rooted in Jain values, contrasting with the divine portrayal in Valmiki’s version.

Page 392 of: Paumacariya (critical study)

Page:

392 (of 671)


External source: Shodhganga (Repository of Indian theses)


Download the PDF file of the original publication


Warning! Page nr. 392 has not been proofread.

SOCIAL CONDITIONS 363 when her chastity was proved before the public. It means
that a satisfactory proof was required on the part of the
women to prove her purity and on production of such a proof
she was accepted by her husband. The chief queen Simhikā was
dishonoured by her husband merely on the doubt of her character
and that doubt had arisen on account of her open fight in a battle
against the enemy-kings when her husband was away from the
capital. When her purity was proved she was restored to her original
status (22.62,70).
Those who were proved to be unchaste were permanently
divorced by their husbands. Brāhmaṇ� Ծ
Ծ
was abandoned by
her husband on account of her unchastity (77.74). Similar was the
case with the queen Kiraṇamaṇḍalā who inspite of being warned
by her husband did not give up her bad habits (101.60). The
Narada Smrti says that a wife who commits adultery should be
divorced (12.90,92). Agnila is said to have been later on accepted
by king Kararuha as his wife (77.75). It indicates that the infidel
wives were divorced and it was just possible that such women could
find place in the harems of kings.
This was the lot of the woman-class but the male-class remained
unaccused or undivorced for infidelity. May be it, but the male-
class was equally responsible. Varāhamihira has equally blamed
men for vices. He in his Bṛhatsaṃhita (Ch.74) rebukes males for
their sexual urges while praises women for their forbearance. He
says that men talk of love to their wives while they go astray outside.
He further remarks that women have more qualites than men
possess.
Consciousness of Self-Respect :-The PCV further reveals that
women were not altogether submissive. They were conscious of
their self-respect and on occasions they duly exhibited it.
It was
due to circumstances or the conditions of the society that even married
women were kidnapped and they had to become the wives of the
kidnappers. Similarly they had to suffer exile, dishonour and
abandonment of the slightest doubt on their character and they were
unable to oppose such impositions. But it was not true everytime.
There were occasions when their self-respect revolted against these
severities and they emphasised that they were not merely the commodi-
ties of market. Thus the PCV reveals that Candrābhā, the wife
of a ruler, who was deceitfully separated from her husband and was
forcibly made his wife by an overlord Madhu, did not hesitate
and feel shy in rebuking Madhu for enjoying another man's wife

Let's grow together!

I humbly request your help to keep doing what I do best: provide the world with unbiased sources, definitions and images. Your donation direclty influences the quality and quantity of knowledge, wisdom and spiritual insight the world is exposed to.

Let's make the world a better place together!

Like what you read? Help to become even better: