Essay name: Paumacariya (critical study)
Author:
K. R. Chandra
Affiliation: Research institute of Prakrit, Jainology and Ahimsa Vaishali
This is a critical study of the Paumacariya: the earliest Jain version of Rama's life story, written in Prakrit by Vimalasuri dating to the 4th century AD. In this text, Rama (referred to as Padma) is depicted with lotus-like eyes and a blooming face. The Paumacariya places emphasis on the human aspects of characters rooted in Jain values, contrasting with the divine portrayal in Valmiki’s version.
Page 293 of: Paumacariya (critical study)
293 (of 671)
External source: Shodhganga (Repository of Indian theses)
Download the PDF file of the original publication
264
A CRITICAL STUDY OF PAUMACARIYA�
the main Rāma-story is held to be based on the ancient Gāthās. These
Gāthās and the Akhyāna Kavya of Rama-story, says Dr. Bulcke
( p. 135), had very presumably originated during the 6th century B. C.
The Buddhist Tripitaka Gāthās concerning the Räma-story are also held
to be based on the old Akhyāna Kavya. (Bulcke, pp. 98. & 134). Brief
Rāma-stories found in the Dronaparva and Santiparva of Mahābhārata
seem to be based on the same Akhyāna Kavya, says Dr. Bulcke (p. 135). He
further states that this Gāthā literature of Rama-story orginated in the
Kośala country and spread towards the west also when the Mahabharata
was composed. He holds that by the time of the 4th century B.C., the
Rama-story (Akhyāna Kavya) had considerably become popular. Pāli
Tripitaka was being composed during that period ( Bulcke, p. 135) and
some matter of the Akhyana Kavya of the Rama-story entered into the
Pāri Tripiṭaka also ( Bulcke, p. 98 ). Thus we can be sure that Rāma-
story in its original and basic form was gaining popularity in North
India by the time of the 4th century B. C. Jainism was also popular-
ising during that period in north India and gradually spreading towards
the west and south hence there is every possibility that the basis of Rāma-
story of the Akhyāna was known to the Jaina tradition. It will be quite
worthwhile here to record the view of Prof. Winternitz about the ancient
popular narratives and how they were utilised by different religions
of India. He says that as early as the time of Buddha there was
in existence an inexhaustible store of prose and verse narratives
Akhyānas, Itihāsas, Purāṇas and Gāthās, forming as it were literary
Buddhists and
public property which was drawn upon by the
h
the Jains, as well as by the epic poets (HIL, I. P. 314). In
view of this opinion the 'nāmāva!is' in the Sthānānga and Samavāyānga
indicate that the Rāma-story in its basic form was known to the
Jaina tradition. The 'series of names' formed the nucleus of the
Rama-story and its details remained with the precetors in the oral
form. These details passed on to the successors by tradition i. e. 'ayariya
paramparāgayam' as Vimalasūri also mentions in his work at 1. 8.
To this we can add the Popular Tradition from which Vimalasūri
seems to have drawn a lot, as evidenced in the above analysis to
compose his Paumacariya�.
3. Rāma's name as Padma :
Now the question arises why Dasarathi Rāma is called Padma in
the Samavāyānga as well as in the Paumacariyam when he is not known
by this name either in the Brahmanical or in the Buddhist literature.
The Samavayanga names Dāśarathi Rāma as Padma and Kṛṣṇa's brother
