Essay name: Paumacariya (critical study)
Author:
K. R. Chandra
Affiliation: Research institute of Prakrit, Jainology and Ahimsa Vaishali
This is a critical study of the Paumacariya: the earliest Jain version of Rama's life story, written in Prakrit by Vimalasuri dating to the 4th century AD. In this text, Rama (referred to as Padma) is depicted with lotus-like eyes and a blooming face. The Paumacariya places emphasis on the human aspects of characters rooted in Jain values, contrasting with the divine portrayal in Valmiki’s version.
Page 126 of: Paumacariya (critical study)
126 (of 671)
External source: Shodhganga (Repository of Indian theses)
Download the PDF file of the original publication
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE RĀMA-STORY F. 屹ṇa's offer for a peace treaty with Rāma : 97 According to the PCV after the recovery of Lakṣmaṇa from
wounds, 屹ṇa is advised by his ministers to liberate Sītā and to
sign a peace treaty with Rāma (65.6). But 屹Բ disregards their
counsel and offers to Rāma through his envoy some parts of his
territory provided he (Rāma) releases his (屹ṇa's) relatives and
屹Բ
foregoes Sītā's return. Rāma rejects the offer and warns
of the fatal consequences if Sītā is not released (65.20).
In the VR there is no mention of it. In the TR it is stated that
Prahasta (Räāvana's son) had, before the commencement of the battle,
requested Ravana to give up Sītā for restoring peace (6.9-10) at
屹ṇa
home.
The Mahānāṭaka¹ refers to the sending of a ‘dūta' by 屹ṇa for
demanded the 'parasu'
making truce with Rāma. 屹Բ had
(Jamadagnya) for returning Sītā, but Rāma disagreed.
In the Khotānī Rāmāyaṇa it is said that 屹Բ after having
been wounded in the battle offered to pay royal toll to Rāma and for
that the latter did not kill the former (Bulcke, p. 395).
G. Acquiring of Bahurupā Vidyā by 屹ṇa :
According to the PCV, 屹Բ, after his proposal being turned
down by Rāma, starts meditating in the Jina temple to acquire
unvanquishable Bahurupā-vidyā for defeating Rāma (66). The
Vanaras cause terror in Laṅkā by torturing the citizens (67). Aṅgada
disturbs 屹ṇa and drags Mandodarī to impede 屹ṇa's success.
But 屹ṇa remains devoted and attains the desired goal (68).
In the VR there is no reference to the performance of any auste-
rity by Ravana for attaining any supernatural power. The perfor-
mance of a sacrifice by Indrajit and its destruction by Lakṣmaṇa has
already been referred to. The north-west version of VR mentions,
after the slaying of Indrajit, the meditation by 屹Բ, the mischief
of the Vanaras to perturb him, the dragging of Mandodarī by Angada
and the incomplete sacrifice of 屹ṇa (Bulcke, p. 380).
The TR mentions the performing of a Yajña by Indrajit as in the
VR. It additionally refers to the sacrifice of 屹ṇa and its being
foiled by Hanumat and Angada who were sent by Rāma after the
death of Indrajit to do so (6. 85). Here 屹ṇa's wives are dragged
and 屹ṇa is kicked.
1, Madhusudana's version (Bulcke,p. 195).
7
