365bet

Amaravati Art in the Context of Andhra Archaeology

by Sreyashi Ray chowdhuri | 2018 | 90,477 words

This page relates ‘Buddhist sculptural art� of the study on Amaravati Art in the Context of Andhra Archaeology, including museum exhibitions of the major archeological antiquities. These pages show how the Buddhist establishment of Amaravati (Andhra Pradesh) survived from 4th century BCE to 14th century CE. It includes references and translations of episodes of Buddha’s life drawn from the Avadanas and Jatakas which are illustrated in Amaravati art.

Go directly to: Footnotes.

Buddhist sculptural art

Undoubtedly the Buddhist sculptural art at Bhārhut, Bodhgayā and Sāñchī are thematically paralleled to the early sculptures from 屹ī. It may be emphasized that the bulk of the sculptures of the Śuṅga period consisted of ٲ첹 and Buddha’s life story. Contemporary art centres also exhibit the same content of which 屹ī art figured prominently. Among several episodes of Buddha’s life story in the Sunga phase, some episodes reveal striking resemblance to the 屹ī narratives. (Pl 38b)

In this regard attention may be drawn towards the depiction of Buddha’s birth on the Bhārhut medallion(Pl 38c). In this narrative Queen Maya is seen reclining on the bed while a large sized elephant is hovering above. The scene is inscribed as bhagavato ukranti (Sanskrit garbhavakranti)[1]. The elephant as the object of dream together with reclining Māyādevī is also visible in other 屹ī reliefs concerning the depiction of Buddha’s birth. However, the posture of sleeping Māyādevī with several flexions seen in the 屹ī narrative preserved in the Indian Museum Collection is absent in the Bhārhut medallion. It may be added that in 屹ī art the elephant is not always represented in Buddha’s birth scene. The specimen in the British Museum Collection (Pl 38d) bears testimony to this.

Inclusion of the 󲹲ᾱ motif in case of Buddha’s birth and nativity scene in the 屹ī reliefs is an interesting feature of this repertoire. While the 󲹲ᾱ motif is depicted at Bhārhut and Sāñchī as a ۲ṣ�, the motif was possibly used for Māyādevī for the first time by the 屹ī artists in the birth scene of Buddha. The reason for such a depiction was possibly the urge of the artists for connecting the fertility symbol, that is, 󲹲ᾱ to the event of the birth of the Master[2]. In this regard it may be emphasized that the 󲹲ᾱs may be considered as tree nymphs or beauties associated with trees[3]. They are connected to fruition and hence represent fertility. The Buddhist biographical literature like the Բ첹ٳ affirms that Māyādevī was ordained to give birth to Buddha while standing[4]. Such descriptions might have inspired the sculptors of 屹ī to establish a relationship between Māyādevī and 󲹲ᾱ. The association of 󲹲ᾱ with Buddha’s birth became a norm in later schools of Indian art.

Footnotes and references:

[back to top]

[1]:

Parimoo Ratan, 2010, Life of Buddha in Indian Sculpture, New Delhi, p 39.

[2]:

Ibid, p 44.

[3]:

Coomaraswamy Ananda K, 1993, Op.cit, p 82.

[4]:

Parimoo Ratan, Op.cit, pp 44�45

Let's grow together!

I humbly request your help to keep doing what I do best: provide the world with unbiased sources, definitions and images. Your donation direclty influences the quality and quantity of knowledge, wisdom and spiritual insight the world is exposed to.

Let's make the world a better place together!

Like what you read? Help to become even better: