365bet娱乐

PREFACE.
xiii
R峁�abhag墨t膩 is a panegyric upon R峁�abha, a Rsi, who is
called here the 8th incarnation of Visnu.
Mok峁�opaya appears to be an old and dilapidated copy
of the Yogavasistha R膩m膩ya峁嘺. In the colophons it is
called :-
-
Iti Valmikiye Mok峁�op膩ye . . and sometimes Iti Mok峁�o
辫腻测别.
Vedastuti-bh膩v膩rthadipik膩d墨panam, by R膩dh膩rama峁嘺,
D膩sa, a follower of Caitanya. In the tenth skandha of the
Bh膩gavatapur膩峁嘺 there is a hymn entitled Srutistuti or
Veda-stuti. Sridharas v膩m墨 commented on the whole of the
Bh膩gavata, and his commentary is known as the Bh膩v膩rtha
Dipik膩. The present work is a commentary on the Bh膩v膩rtha
dipik膩 on the 艢rutistuti hymn.
R膩dh膩峁ａ弓amivratakath膩 is a part of the Bhavi峁�yottara-
Pur膩峁嘺. It is an interlocution between K峁涐梗峁嘺 and Narada.
R膩dh膩峁ａ弓am墨p奴j膩vidhi岣� and Radhik膩janmarahasyam, Nos.
249 and 252, are both from the Brahmavaivarttapur膩峁嘺.
R膩marak峁Ｄ乻totra, the extent of which is 146 slokas
only, is commonly styled Mantrar膩m膩ya峁嘺. Portions of it
are written in Vedic style. The MS. has been noticed in
No. 215. It is commented upon by Nilakantha, the son of
Govinda艣奴ri of the Caturdhara family of Benares. The
commentary is called Mantrarahasyaprak膩艣ika noticed in
No. 216.
Similarly there is a work called Mantra-k膩si-kha峁囜笉a, a
commentary on which by the same Nilakantha is noticed in
No. 213. Both the texts were restored by the commentator
himself.
There are two new commentaries on the Dev墨m膩h膩tmya
unknown to A眉frecht; one is by Kevala and the other by
M膩dhava 艢arm膩. The last was composed in 1531 Saka.
N膩gojibha峁�峁璦 wrote a commentary on the same work,
and along with it he wrote a short treatise on the method
of using the Dev墨m膩h膩tmya, under the title of Saptasati-
prayoga, which is noticed in No. 327.