365bet娱乐

The available title of this work, i.e 鈥�罢腻濒补濒补办峁�a峁嘺尘鈥� is obtained from the relevant manuscript catalogues. It is a reasonably common practice to assign generic names such as 鈥�R膩galak峁�a峁嘺m鈥�, 鈥湴漳灞舨贡舨拱灬梗a峁嘺尘鈥�, 鈥淩膩gaprakara峁嘺m鈥�, 鈥�罢腻濒腻诲丑测腻测补岣�鈥�, etc., depending on the subject matter, to manuscripts whose titles are unknown. This could have been the reason that this work was titled 鈥�罢腻濒补濒补办峁�a峁嘺尘鈥�.

Another possibility can be gleaned from the n膩nd墨 艣濒辞办补 of this work.

啶掂た啶粪�嵿ぃ啷佮�� 啶侧�嬥�曕�椸�佮ぐ啷佮�� 啶�啷嵿ぐ啶｀ぎ啷嵿�� 啶多た啶班じ啶� 啶粪ぃ啷嵿ぎ啶距ぐ啷嵿�椸じ啶ㄠ�嵿う啶班�嵿ざ啶曕ぎ啷�
啶曕��啶班�嵿い啶苦お啷嵿ぐ啷�啶むた啶曕ぐ啶� 啶溹え啶膏�嵿�� 啶侧�樴�佮え啶� 啶曕ぞ啶侧�囙�� 啶曕ぞ啶�啶�啷嵿ぐ啶︵ぎ啷� 啷�
啶膏�囙さ啷嵿く啶� 啶膏う啷嵿く啶むた啶�啶苦ぐ啷嵿ぇ啷冟い啶�啷嵿げ啷佮い啶�啶︵�� 啶ㄠ�嵿く啶距じ啶距い啷嵿い啶侧�嬥�曕い啷嵿ぐ啶�啶�啷�
啶むぞ啶侧ぞ啶ㄠぞ啶� 啶曕ぅ啶�啶距ぎ啶� 啶侧�曕�嵿し啶｀ぎ啶灌�� 啶�啷傕ぐ啷嵿さ啷嬥�曕�嵿い啶多ぞ啶膏�嵿い啷嵿ぐ啶曕�嵿ぐ啶�啶距い啷� 啷�

vi峁ａ箛u峁� lokaguru峁� pra峁嘺mya 艣iras膩 峁�a峁噈膩rgasandar艣akam
k墨rtipr墨tikara峁� janasya laghun膩 k膩lena k膩mapradam |
sevya峁� sadyatibhirdh峁泃aplutapada峁� ny膩s膩ttalokatrayam
t膩l膩n膩峁� kathay膩mi lak峁�a峁嘺maha峁� p奴rvokta艣膩strakram膩t ||

In this 艣濒辞办补 the author says 鈥�t膩l膩n膩峁� kathay膩mi lak峁�a峁嘺maha峁�鈥� which could have led to the naming of this work as 鈥�罢腻濒补濒补办峁�a峁嘺尘鈥�.&苍产蝉辫;

It is a fact that none of the manuscripts containing this work have any mention of the title鈥敯漳灞舨贡舨拱灬梗a峁嘺尘. Thus it is possible that the title 罢腻濒补濒补办峁�a峁嘺尘 is a generic one, and not particular to this work and was given to this work at a later date. If 罢腻濒补濒补办峁�a峁嘺尘 is not the title, then what is? 

M. R. Kavi mentions a work called T膩lakal膩v膩rdhi/ 罢腻濒补办补濒腻产诲丑颈 of Acyutar膩ya in his book 叠丑补谤补迟补办辞艣补. 

V. Premalatha says:

鈥�From the scholarly references made by the modern writers on music literature, mentioned earlier, it can be inferred that there really exists a work called 罢腻濒补办补濒腻产诲丑颈, written by Acyutar膩ya. However, there are a few problems regarding the authenticity of the name of the work and its authorship. Both the manuscripts which are taken for this study presently bear the title, 鈥�罢腻濒补濒补办峁�a峁嘺尘鈥� and are accompanied by a Telugu commentary. Both deal with the T膩lada艣apra峁嘺-s exclusively. When their contents are studied, there does not appear any colophon or any other indication regarding the title of the work, though the titles of various other works which have been quoted as paraphrases are found in many places in the manuscripts. For example, the T膩lakal膩vil膩sa (p.51), Ra峁単ar膩ja-bharata-vy膩khy膩, N峁泃tac奴岣嵞乵a峁噄 (p.35) and so on in R7979. Under these circumstances it is quite curious how the title, 罢腻濒补办补濒腻产诲丑颈 was assigned to this work. Perhaps there was some other source (another manuscript) that was available to Ramakrishna Kavi based on which he assigned the title to the work.鈥�^[1]

Though we find that the readings in 叠丑补谤补迟补办辞艣补 under the name Acyuta, and those found in the manuscripts of 罢腻濒补濒补办峁�a峁嘺尘 are a perfect match, the fact still remains that none of the manuscripts bear any title, be it 罢腻濒补濒补办峁�a峁嘺尘, 罢腻濒补办补濒腻产诲丑颈 or 罢腻濒补办补濒腻惫补谤诲丑颈. Some modern scholars such as V. Raghavan, R. Sathyanarayana, T. V. Mahalingam mention the work 罢腻濒补办补濒腻产诲丑颈 and the author Acyutar膩ya. But no one appears to have had access to the content of the work. Our only source of information regarding the textual content of this work, the title as well as the name of the author is Ramakrishna Kavi through his book, 叠丑补谤补迟补办辞艣补. Even in this case, what evidence Ramakrishna Kavi possessed, on whose strength he equated this work, its title viz. 罢腻濒补办补濒腻产诲丑颈 and its author viz. Acyutar膩ya is still unknown.

Footnotes and references:

[back to top]

[1]:

罢腻濒补办补濒腻产诲丑颈 of Acyutar膩ya: 2009: Vol 80: p.98