365bet

Kavyamimamsa of Rajasekhara (Study)

by Debabrata Barai | 2014 | 105,667 words

This page relates ‘Rajashekhara’s Race and Caste� of the study on the Kavyamimamsa of Rajasekhara: a poetical encyclopedia from the 9th century dealing with the ancient Indian science of poetics and rhetoric (also know as alankara-shastra). The Kavya-mimamsa is written in eighteen chapters representing an educational framework for the poet (kavi) and instructs him in the science of applied poetics for the sake of making literature and poetry (kavya).

Go directly to: Footnotes.

Part 4 - Ჹś󲹰’s Race and Caste

Ჹś󲹰 calls himself as 屹īⲹ[1] in the 屹ⲹīṃs. Because he was born in family and he was the better known as to his successor.

“The name rājaśekhara ( Ի� śekhara yasya) means ś (Իś󲹰 being given by Amara as a synonym of ś)�[2].

In the introductory verses of վ첹ñᲹī, ٳ󲹲Բ refers to his as an Kavi.

samādhiguṇaśālinya� prasannaparipakrimā� |
yāyāvarakavervāco munīnāmiva vṛttaya�
|| �
   - Tilakamañjarī of ٳ󲹲Բ: 33

And ṭṭ [ḍḍ󲹱], the author of 岹ⲹܲԻ岹ī notice him as a simply and praises him for his dramatic skill.

yāyāvara� prañjāvaro guṇañjairāśaṃsita� sūrisamājavayai� �
nṛtyatyudāra� bhaṇiterguṇasthā naṭīva yasyoṭharasā padaśrī
||
   - 岹ⲹܲԻ岹ī of ṭṭ [ḍḍ󲹱]: VIII

Ჹś󲹰 was very proud for him and his family literary forefathers.

However he belonged to the family but it is not clear that he was a 󳾲ṇa or ṣaٰⲹ. According to ⲹṇa Dikṣita 屹 means a kind of ṛhٳ[3]. C.f.

dvividho goṣṭho yāyāvarīya� śālīna� ca
   - ñ첹ṛt (Mitakṣarā comm.): I/ 12

Means there are two kinds of ṛa󲹲ٳ: The and the ŚīԲ, but probably is the name of the 󳾲ṇa family. Apte remarks[4], Ჹś󲹰 must also be presumed to have been a 󳾲ṇa, because he was not becoming guru or ܱⲹ of ѲԻ and Ѳ󾱱[5] and also he is said to be an incarnation of 󲹱ūپ.

On the other hand, Ჹś󲹰’s wife ԳīܲԻ岹ī was the Cauhāna ṣaٰⲹ family, so he may be ṣaⲹ. But when Ჹś󲹰 was belong, those times anuloma marriage was accepted in society. In the ѲԳܲṃh says:

śūdraiva bhāryā śūdrasya sā ca svā ca viśa� smṛta� |
te ca svā caiva rāñja� syustāśca svā cāgrajanmana�
|| �
   - ѲԳܲṃh: III/ 13

And the ñ첹ṛt also says about the anuloma marriage as:

tisro varṇānupūrveṇa dve tathaikā yathākramam |
vrāhmaṇakṣatriyaviśā� bhāryā svā śūdrajanmana�
|| �
   - ñ첹ṛt: I/3/ 53

So it seems that Ჹś󲹰’s was born in a 󳾲ṇa family.

Brahmana Family tree

󳾲ṇa,
ŚīԲ,
屹īⲹ > Ჹ岹 > Ѳṣṭ ū峾ṇi > ܰԲԻ岹 > Tarala > ,
Śī屹ī > Durduka,
ԳīܲԻ岹ī > Ჹś󲹰

Footnotes and references:

[back to top]

[1]:

yāyāvarīya� saṅkṣipya munīnā� matavistaram � K.M: Ch- 1, Pp-2

[2]:

Kane, P. V. History of Sanskrit Poetics, MLBD, Delhi, 1971, Pp-215

[3]:

վśñᾱ. Commentary on -I/ 5

[4]:

Ჹś󲹰’s life and writing. Harvard Oriental Series, Cambridge, Vol-IV,1901, Pp-180

[5]:

raghuku latilako mahendrapāla� sakalakalānilaya� sa yasya śṣy� � � վśñᾱ: I/ 6,

devo yasya mahendrapālanṛpati� śṣy� raghusāmagrī� � � B-ٲ: I/ 11.

tena mahīpāladevena ca raghuvaṃśamuku ṭamaṇinā āryāvartamahāghirājena śrīnirbhayanare ndranandanenārādhitā� sabhāsada� � � : I/ 7

Let's grow together!

I humbly request your help to keep doing what I do best: provide the world with unbiased sources, definitions and images. Your donation direclty influences the quality and quantity of knowledge, wisdom and spiritual insight the world is exposed to.

Let's make the world a better place together!

Like what you read? Help to become even better: