365bet

The concept of Yoga in Yoga Upanishads

by Philomina T.L | 2018 | 42,235 words

This page relates ‘The Concept of Mind and its Nature� of study dealing with the evolution and significance of Yoga as reflected in the Yoga-Upanishads, a collection of authoritative texts dedicated to the concept of Yoga (spiritual discipline). The thesis traces the origins of the practice back to pre-Vedic times and and suggests that Yoga became a philosophical system following the creation of the Yogasutras.

Go directly to: Footnotes.

3. The Concept of Mind and its Nature

The term �Mahat’in the system of ṃkⲹ connotates the citta of the yoga system. In yoga the term �citta� indicates the comprehensive form of buddhi; Գٲ첹ṇa (self-consciousness) and mind. Each of these has its own significant function and also has common functions like the life-process.[1] But often we mistake both as one and the same. The mind is considered as one of the fields of activities of citta and it is also said that the gross performance of citta runs through it. The mind which issues forth the ideas to the external organs creates the concepts in order to the expediments (ṃs) of citta. So also the mind prompts the imaginations and illuminations.

The concept of mind is treated differently by different scholars. Western psychologists describe it as the comprehensive state of conscious, sub-conscious and super conscious states. Some consider mind as something substantial in the human being. But modern science argues that mind is merely a function or an activity. Actually mind is treated as a sense organ and as an organ of action because it performs the activities of both kinds of organs such as reflection, perception and conception. Here, as a sense organ, the mind forms the indeterminate knowledge that renders it to determinate as an organ of action.

In the system of yoga the term ‘mind� indicates the means by which we think.[2] There is an internal organ accompanied with the contact of senses and object (Իⲹṣaⲹ-ԲԾ첹ṣa) [indriyaviṣayaԲԾ첹ṣa�] which produce perception. The apprehension of an object can be attained through its perfection along with that internal organ only and this comes to be known as the mind. ʲٲñᲹ and ṣy첹 sometimes refer to mind as equivalent to buddhi and citta. But 峦貹پ refers citta as the internal organ of buddhi. Mind is regarded as the first evaluate of ʰṛt. It is subjected to the ٰṇa of sattva, rajas and tamas and also to the transformations according to the intensity of each guna. ٳٱṇa surpasses illumination, Dzṇa of activity and ٲDzṇa of laziness. The mind is predominant with the ٳٱṇa even though the shade of ٲDzṇa obstructs it from the manifestation of objects. But when this obstruction is removed by the activity of rajas, mind can manifest its objects.

Mind has many functions and activities. Sometimes it is said to be an instrument of soul. Always mind is regarded as an intellect and consciousness but in the view of Sasidharan Nair the intelligence that which has the mind is borrowed intelligence. He also says that mind is supposed as a faculty with a collection of recorded impressions through senses from the external world. The controlling of mind from such impressions is possible only through high discipline and meditation. One can withdraw his attention from the external objects and focus it on a particular one. Thus one can vanish the borrowed intelligence and also can make his own thoughts as ṛśy.

States and Modes of mind

There are infinite numbers of selves existing along with as much of minds. These minds are all pervading and eternal like space; and also it is regarded as the instrument to experience pleasure and pain. Due to (false knowledge) the mind is limited by its modes of desires which hinder its ability to reveal the objects such as a pot limits the infinite or all-pervading space.

The mind is the substance (dharmin) which dwells in its five states or it has five types of behaviour such as:

  1. ūḍh,
  2. ṣiٲ,
  3. viṣiٲ,
  4. and
  5. niruddha.

The [following] are the five mental modes ʲٲñᲹ treats mind as a stream of these mental modes:

  1. ṇa,
  2. viparyaya
  3. vikalpa,
  4. nidra and
  5. ṛt.

Here ṇa which leads to the truth is treated as the means to valid knowledge. Viparyaya is an erroneous assumption which is not compatible to the nature of the object. Vikalpa is a notion devoid of an object. Again is the apprehension of absence and lastly ṛt is retention of past experiences in mind. All these five mental modes are either ṣṭ or aṣṭ (afflicted and unafflicted)

The ṣṭ bring forth the merits and demerits while aṣṭ provide the 첹ñԲ, that is the discriminative knowledge. is the cause of ṣṭ which leads to bondage while due to 첹ñԲ akiliṣṭas loosen this bondage. Even though both are contradictory to each other, they are scattered among themselves. Both produce their own impression (ṃs) when this cycle of mental modes and impression is destroyed through the discriminative knowledge. Then the mind attains the supreme nature of the self.

The mind thinks, acts and functions as a bridge among the subjects and the objects. It ascertains the relationship between the sense which controls the indriyas and activates the body to action. The mind is regarded as the source of all knowledge which forms the needs and desires. It is responsible for good and bad activities which lead oneself to heaven or hell.

Footnotes and references:

[back to top]

[1]:

Cultural Heritage of India, p.512.

[2]:

Patañjala Yogadarṣanam: Vyāsabhāṣyam, Haribrahmedrananda, Intro. P.XIII.

Let's grow together!

I humbly request your help to keep doing what I do best: provide the world with unbiased sources, definitions and images. Your donation direclty influences the quality and quantity of knowledge, wisdom and spiritual insight the world is exposed to.

Let's make the world a better place together!

Like what you read? Help to become even better: