365bet娱乐

THE HISTORY OF LAK峁�ANA 15 VIII
Coming to Abhinavagupta's own view of Lak峁�a峁嘺-the
main thread of his view must be caught in the bewildering text
on this concept in various places in this chapter. He points
out even at the outset that these views cannot stand to
be logical when we consider the 36 Lak峁�a峁嘺s themselves
one by one in the light of these views; for, to a certain
extent, the views have been purely speculative, spinning round
the word Lak峁�a峁嘺 having its counterpart in the S膩mudrika-
lak峁�a峁嘺 of the human body, without relating themselves
to the nature of the individual Lak峁�a峁嘺s. So Abhinavagupta
makes a convenient suggestion that the 10 views cannot be
exclusively and separately followed.
啶忇い啷囙し啷� 啶�啶曕�嵿し啷囙し啷� 啶呧え啷嵿く啶むぎ啶椸�嵿ぐ啶灌�� 啶掂た啶多�囙し啶｀ぞ啶ㄠ�� 啶� 啶膏�傕�椸�氞�嵿�涏え啷嵿い啷� 啶膏�嵿お啶粪�嵿�熰�囙え 啶�啶ム�� 啷�
[ete峁�u pak峁�e峁�u anyatamagrahe vi艣e峁�a峁嚹乶i na sa峁僩acchante spa峁ａ弓ena path膩 |
] p. 381.
One comprehensive and definite view must be made
out of the cloud of these several Pak峁�as. Abhinava adopts
shades of each view and gives his own definite idea of
Lak峁�a峁嘺, which itself takes conclusive shape only as he
proceeds further and further. Here and there Abhinava can-
not help pushing new wine into old bottles in his difficult
task. One line of thought he has definitely rejected and
that is, the association of Lak峁�a峁嘺 with N膩峁璦ka only and
taking it as something like Sandhyangakas. He refutes this
view in this chapter and elsewhere also while dealing with
the Vithyangas. He says there-
啶ㄠえ啷嵿さ啷囙し啶距ぎ啷� ( 啶掂��啶ム�嵿く啶權�嵿�椸ぞ啶ㄠぞ啶�啷� ) 啶夃�曕�嵿い啶苦さ啷堗�氞た啶む�嵿ぐ啷嵿く啶班�傕お啶む�嵿さ啶�
啶呧げ啶傕�曕ぞ啶班ぞ啶︵た啶�啷嵿く啶� 啶曕�� 啶�啷囙�� 啶囙い啶� 啷�
啶氞�囙い啷� 啶侧�曕�嵿し啶� [ 啶�啷�
[nanve峁Ｄ乵 ( v墨thya峁単膩n膩m ) uktivaicitryar奴patva峁�
ala峁僰膩r膩dibhya岣� ko bheda iti |
cet lak峁�a峁嘺 [ m
]