365bet娱乐

Sanskrit text, Unicode transliteration and English translation by Ganganath Jha:

啶呧え啷嵿え啶距う啷� 啶�啷嵿ぐ啷傕ぃ啶灌�� 啶�啶距ぐ啷嵿し啷嵿�熰た 啶�啶む�嵿く啷� 啶�啶距ぐ啷嵿く啶距そ啶�啶氞ぞ啶班た啶｀�� 啷�
啶椸�佮ぐ啷� 啶多た啶粪�嵿く啶多�嵿�� 啶�啶距�溹�嵿く啶多�嵿�� 啶膏�嵿い啷囙え啷� 啶班ぞ啶溹え啶� 啶曕た啶侧�嵿が啶苦し啶�啷� 啷� 啷┼ェ啷� 啷�

ann膩de bhr奴峁嘺h膩 尘腻谤峁ａ弓颈 patyau bh膩ry膩'pac膩ri峁嚹� |
gurau 艣i峁�ya艣ca y膩jya艣ca steno r膩jani kilbi峁�am || 317 ||

The Embryo-killer expurgates his guilt on him who eats his food, the misbehaving wife on her husband, the disciple and the sacrificer on the preceptor, and the thief on the king.鈥�(317)

 

Medh膩tithi鈥檚 commentary (manubh膩峁�ya):

鈥�础苍苍腻诲补鈥欌�攐ne who eats food.

鈥�叠丑谤奴峁嘺丑腻鈥欌�攈e who has killed a 叠谤腻丑尘补峁嘺.

This latter 鈥�expurgates鈥� throws upon 鈥�the man who eats his food鈥欌赌斺赌�the guilt,鈥� of killing the 叠谤腻丑尘补峁嘺; just as when the dirty cloth is washed in water, its dirt becomes thrown into the water.

This is a purely valedictory declaration. The meaning is that the guilt becomes separated from the 叠谤腻丑尘补峁嘺-killer, and attaches itself to the other man.

On the 鈥�pati鈥欌�攖he husband 鈥斺��the mishaving鈥欌赌攁诲耻濒迟别谤辞耻蝉鈥斺赌�wife鈥欌�攊f he condones the act. Here also the guilt disappears from the wife and attaches itself to the husband.

鈥�On the preceptor, the disciple and the sacrificer鈥�;鈥攊f the disciple transgresses the laws relating to sun-rise, etc., and the preceptor condones it, the guilt becomes thrown upon the latter. Similarly the 鈥榮acrificer鈥� on the officiating priest; since the latter is a 鈥榩receptor鈥�; that is why the 鈥榦fficiating priest鈥� has not been mentioned separately.

Similarly 鈥�the thief on the King,鈥欌�攊f he is not punished by the King.

If the sacrificer, in course of the sacrificial performances, transgresses the rules, and does not adhere to the advice of the officiating priest,鈥攖hen he should be abandoned by the latter; and he is not to be chastised and beaten, in the manner of a disciple.

In regard to the 鈥�man who eats his food鈥� and the rest, the present text should not he taken as laying down an injunction; the whole of it is purely declamatory.鈥�(317)

 

Explanatory notes by Ganganath Jha

Mss. N and S place 317 and its 叠丑腻峁�y补 after 318 but both add a note to the effect鈥斺��ayam shloko r膩jabhirityasm膩t p奴rvam lekhan墨ya岣�鈥�, 鈥榯his verse should be written after the verse r膩jabhi岣� &c.鈥� This is apparently a corrector鈥檚 note on the mistake committed by a copyist.

This verse is quoted in 痴墨谤补尘颈迟谤辞诲补测补 (膧hnika, p. 509), which adds the following note:鈥斺��碍颈濒惫颈峁�a尘鈥� is to be construed with each of the four鈥斺��补苍苍腻诲补鈥�, 鈥�pati鈥�, 鈥�guru鈥� and 鈥�谤腻箩腻鈥欌�攁nd 鈥�尘腻谤峁ａ弓颈鈥� means 鈥榩asses on.鈥�

It is quoted in 笔谤腻测补艣肠颈迟迟补惫颈惫别办补 (p. 146), which explains 鈥�尘腻谤峁ａ弓颈鈥� as 鈥榯ransfer鈥�;鈥攁nd in 贬别尘腻诲谤颈 (艢r膩ddha, p. 781).

 

Comparative notes by various authors

痴补艣颈峁ａ弓丑补 (19.44).鈥斺�楾hey quote the following verse:鈥斺�淭he slayer of a learned 叠谤腻丑尘补峁嘺 casts his guilt on him who eats his food; a misbehaving wife on her husband; a student and a sacrificer on the teacher and the officiating priest; and a thief on the King.鈥� The guilt falls on the King who pardons an offender, if he causes him to he slain, he destroys sin in accordance with the sacred law.鈥�

膧辫补蝉迟补尘产补 (1.19.15).鈥斺�楾hey quote the following:鈥斺�淭he murderer of a 叠谤腻丑尘补峁嘺 learned in the Veda heaps his guilt on his guest; an innocent man on his calumniator; a thief set at liberty, on the King; and the petitioner, on him who makes false promises.鈥�