365bet娱乐

Sanskrit text, Unicode transliteration and English translation by Ganganath Jha:

啶�啷冟ぅ啶曕�� 啶�啷冟ぅ啶椸�� 啶掂ぞ 啶�啶苦ざ啷嵿ぐ啷� 啶掂ぞ 啶掂た啶掂ぞ啶灌�� 啶�啷傕ぐ啷嵿さ啶氞�嬥う啶苦い啷� 啷�
啶椸ぞ啶ㄠ�嵿ぇ啶班�嵿さ啷� 啶班ぞ啶曕�嵿し啶膏ざ啷嵿�氞�堗�� 啶оぐ啷嵿ぎ啷嵿く啷� 啶曕�嵿し啶む�嵿ぐ啶膏�嵿�� 啶む�� 啶膏�嵿ぎ啷冟い啷� 啷� 啷ㄠガ 啷�

p峁泃hak p峁泃hag v膩 mi艣rau v膩 viv膩hau p奴rvacoditau |
g膩ndharvo r膩k峁�asa艣caiva dharmyau k峁�atrasya tau sm峁泃au || 26 ||

 The two forms of marriage mentioned before鈥�i.e., the 骋腻苍诲丑补谤惫补 and the 搁腻办峁�a蝉补鈥攈ave been declared, whether separately or mixed, to be lawful for the 碍峁�a迟谤颈测补.鈥�(26)

 

Medh膩tithi鈥檚 commentary (尘补苍耻产丑腻峁�y补):

鈥�Singly鈥欌�攖his is a inert re-iteration, each single form having been already prescribed in the foregoing verses. The 鈥榤ixed鈥� form is what is prescribed here; where the 鈥�骋腻苍诲丑补谤惫补-搁腻办峁�a蝉补鈥� are prescribed independently of (apart from) the other forms. The notion derived from what has gone before being that each form stands apart by itself, just like the 痴谤墨丑颈 being used apart from the Yava,鈥攖he present verse lays down the combination (of two). When we have two such texts as 鈥榦ffer the 痴谤墨丑颈鈥� and 鈥榦ffer the Yava? each of which prescribes a substance to be used at a sacrifice independently of the other,鈥攚e conclude that the two are meant to be optional alternatives, and they are not meant to be mixed tip; because, if the mixture of both were used, we would be obeying neither the injunction of Yava, nor that of 痴谤墨丑颈. Similarly, in the present case, when only one girl is to be married, it being impossible to adopt any two forms of marriage, the present text proceeds to prescribe the combination of two of them.

Such a combination of the said two forms would be possible under the following circumstances:鈥擜 girl living in her father鈥檚 house, happens to see a boy living in the same house and having heard praises from messengers, falls in love with him, but not being mistress of herself she cannot meet him,鈥攁nd then she enters into a compact with her lover, requests him to take her away by some means or other, and gets herself carried away: and the bridegroom, being possessed of great strength, carries her away after having 鈥榢illed and wounded鈥� (her guardians): Now in this case, since there is 鈥榲oluntary union between the two鈥� (verse 32), it fulfils the conditions of the 鈥�骋腻苍诲丑补谤惫补鈥� form: while, since he has carried her away, after 鈥榟aving killed and wounded鈥� (verse 33), the conditions of the 鈥�搁腻办峁�a蝉补鈥� form also become fulfilled.

These two forms are possible for the 碍峁�a迟谤颈测补 only. These two are lawful for the 碍峁�a迟谤颈测补鈥攕ays the Text.

Mentioned before鈥攊s a mere reiterative reference.

Others have offered the following explanation:鈥擶hen a 碍峁�a迟谤颈测补 marries several girls, he marries one by the 鈥�骋腻苍诲丑补谤惫补鈥� form, and another by the 鈥�搁腻办峁�a蝉补鈥� form:鈥攁nd this is the 鈥�mixed form鈥� meant by the text. And when all are married by one or the other of these two forms, it is a case of 鈥�separately鈥� mentioned by the text. And from this we gather that it is only these two forms of marriage that the 碍峁�a迟谤颈测补 might adopt promiscuously鈥攕ometimes the one and sometimes the other; while in the case of the 鈥�笔谤腻箩腻辫补迟测补鈥� and the rest, he should adopt the same form in all his marriages which he happens to adopt in the first.鈥�(26)

 

Explanatory notes by Ganganath Jha

This verse is quoted in 痴墨谤补尘颈迟谤辞诲补测补 (Sa峁僺k膩ra, p. 860), where the following notes are added:鈥擳his lays down the forms.permissible for the 碍峁�a迟谤颈测补 under abnormal circumstances.鈥斺��笔峁泃丑补办鈥� means unmixed, and 鈥�惭颈艣谤补,鈥� mixed; we have the latter form in a case where the marriage having been previously settled by mutual understanding between the bride and the bridegroom, if the bride鈥檚 people oppose it, the bridegroom takes her away by force, as happened in the case of K峁涐梗峁嘺鈥檚 marriage with Rukmi峁嚹� (described in the 叠丑腻驳补惫补迟补). A further distinction has got to be made here: the 鈥榤ixed鈥� form is permissible only under abnormal conditions, while the 鈥榰nmixed鈥� one is a secondary form permissible for all time; and hence the mention of this latter in the present verse is merely reiterative (as remarked by Medh膩tithi also),鈥攖he reiteration being made for the purpose of indicating the utter inferiority of the 鈥榤ixed鈥� to the 鈥榰nmixed鈥� form. This implies that for other castes also, in the event of an 鈥榰nmixed鈥� form being not possible, the 鈥榤ixed鈥� form becomes permissible.鈥擡ven though the Pai艣膩ca has been prohibited for all, yet it has been mentioned among the forms of marriage only for the purpose of its being permitted for the Vai艣ya and the 艢奴dra under exceptionally abnormal circumstances.

惭补诲补苍补辫腻谤颈箩腻迟补 (p. 160) also quotes this verse as laying down what is permissible for the 碍峁�a迟谤颈测补 under abnormal conditions. 墨t adds the following notes:鈥斺��笔峁泃丑补办 p峁泃hak鈥� means the primary and the secondary forms, laid down as alternatives; and the second half quotes an example of the 鈥榤ixed鈥� form; there is a 鈥榤ixture鈥� of the 骋腻苍诲丑补谤惫补 and 搁腻办峁�a蝉补 forms when after a mutual understanding has been arrived at between the bride and the bridegroom, if the bride鈥檚 people raise objections to the marriage, the bridegroom fights with them and takes away the bride by force.鈥擳his is to be understood only as an illustration; on the same analogy, other 鈥榤ixtures鈥� may be permissible for other castes also.鈥擡ven though very much deprecated, the Pai艣膩ca form is permitted under abnormal circumstances for the Vai艣ya and the 艢奴dra,鈥攁s also for such twice-born persons as have adopted the living of the Vai艣ya or the 艢奴dra.

This verse is quoted in 贬别尘腻诲谤颈 (D膩na, p. 682).

 

Comparative notes by various authors

惭补丑腻产丑腻谤补迟补 (膧di-parva, 73. 12-13).鈥斺�楾he 骋腻苍诲丑补谤惫补 and the 搁腻办峁�a蝉补 are lawful for the 碍峁�a迟谤颈测补: the two may be performed either separately or jointly.鈥�

叠补耻诲丑腻测补苍补 (1. 11. 16).鈥斺�楽ome people commend the 骋腻苍诲丑补谤惫补 for all,鈥攕ince it is accompanied by love.鈥�