365bet娱乐

76
碍腻惫测腻濒补苍办补谤补-蝉腻谤补-蝉补苍驳谤补丑补.
Ruyyaka has :-
啶�啷囙う啶�啷嵿ぐ啶距ぇ啶距え啷嵿く啷� 啶夃お啶�啶距え啶距う啷佮お啶�啷囙く啶膏�嵿く啶距ぇ啶苦�曕�嵿く啷� 啶掂た啶�啶班�嵿く啶�啷� 啶掂ぞ 啶掂�嵿く啶むた啶班�囙�曕�� 啷� 啶呧げ啶曕ぞ啶班じ啶班�嵿さ啶膏�嵿さ,
[bhedapr膩dh膩nye upam膩n膩dupameyasy膩dhikye viparyaye v膩 vyatireka岣� | alak膩rasarvasva,
] P. 9. As the example of the second variety he gives the
verse of Rudrata -- 啶曕�嵿し啷�啶｀�� 啶曕�嵿し啷�啶｀�嬥お啶� 啶多ざ啷� [k峁Ｄ�峁嘺岣� k峁Ｄ�峁噊pi 艣补艣墨 ] etc., and explains 啶氞え啷嵿う啷嵿ぐ啶距お啷囙�曕�嵿し啶�啶�
啶� 啶�啷屶さ啶ㄠじ啷嵿�� 啶ㄠ�嵿く啷傕え啶椸�佮ぃ啶む�嵿さ啶�啷� 啷� 啶多ざ啶苦さ啷堗げ啶曕�嵿し啶｀�嵿く啷囙え 啶むじ啷嵿く啶距お啷佮え啶班ぞ啶椸ぎ啶距い啷� 啷�
[肠补苍诲谤腻辫别办峁�a测腻
ca yauvanasya ny奴nagu峁嘺tvam | 艣a艣ivailak峁�a峁噛ena tasy膩punar膩gam膩t |
] The verse ' 啶曕�嵿し啷�啶｀�� 啶曕�嵿し啷�啶｀�嬥お啶� 啶多ざ啷� [k峁Ｄ�峁嘺岣� k峁Ｄ�峁噊pi 艣补艣墨] ' must be a composition of
Rudrata as it is found in his and is in the ary膩
metre. All the verses in are his own. Therefore
if we accept the view of Mamma峁璦 we must say that
Rudrata himself did not grasp the real meaning of his
verse; for he has cited it to illustrate the superiority of
啶夃お啶�啶距�� [耻辫补尘腻苍补 ] over 啶夃お啶�啷囙��. [upameya. ] Mammata has very clearly shown that
the 啶嗋ぇ啶苦�曕�嵿く [腻诲丑颈办测补 ] in this verse is of 啶夃お啶�啷囙�� [upameya ] over 啶夃お啶�啶距�� [耻辫补尘腻苍补 ] i e of 啶�啷屶さ啶�
[yauvana
] over 啶多ざ啷� [艣补艣墨 ] and not vice versa. He says - '啶曕�嵿し啷�啶｀�� 啶曕�嵿し啷�啶｀�嬥そ啶�啶� 啶多ざ啷�...... [k峁Ｄ�峁嘺岣� k峁Ｄ�峁噊'pi 艣补艣墨......] '
-- 啶囙い啷嵿く啶距う啶距さ啷佮お啶�啶距え啶膏�嵿く啷嬥お啶�啷囙く啶距う啶距ぇ啶苦�曕�嵿く啶�啶苦い啶� 啶曕�囙え啶氞た啶︵�佮�曕�嵿い啶� 啶むう啶�啷佮�曕�嵿い啶�啷� 啷� 啶呧い啷嵿ぐ 啶�啷屶さ啶ㄠ�椸い啶�-
啶膏�嵿ぅ啷堗ぐ啷嵿く啶距ぇ啶苦さ啶�啶� 啶灌た 啶掂た啶掂�曕�嵿し啶苦い啶�啷� 啷� 啶曕ぞ啶掂�嵿く啶�啷嵿ぐ啶曕ぞ啶多��, [ity膩d膩v耻辫补尘腻苍补syopamey膩d腻诲丑颈办测补miti kenacidukta峁� tadayuktam | atra yauvanagat膩-
sthairy膩dhivaya峁� hi vivak峁�itam | k膩vyaprak膩艣a岣�, ] X, p. 645.
It is peculiar to note that Bhamaha does not include
啶嗋ぇ啶苦�曕�嵿く [腻诲丑颈办测补 ] of 啶夃お啶�啶距�� [耻辫补尘腻苍补 ] over 啶夃お啶�啷囙��. [upameya. ] He says-
啶夃お啶�啶距え啶掂い啷嬥ぐ啷嵿ぅ啶膏�嵿く 啶�啶︵�嵿さ啶苦ざ啷囙し啶ㄠた啶︵ぐ啷嵿ざ啶ㄠぎ啷� 啷�
啶掂�嵿く啶むた啶班�囙�曕�� 啶むぎ啶苦�氞�嵿�涏え啷嵿い啶� 啶掂た啶多�囙し啶距お啶距う啶ㄠぞ啶︵�嵿く啶ムぞ 啷�
啶掂�嵿く啶むた啶班�囙��.
- 啶�啶距ぎ啶灌ぞ啶侧�傕�曕ぞ啶�, 啷�.啷�啷�.
[耻辫补尘腻苍补vatorthasya yadvi艣e峁�anidar艣anam |
vyatireka峁� tamicchanti vi艣e峁Ｄ乸膩dan膩dyath膩 ||
vyatireka.
- bh膩mah膩la峁僰膩ra, 2.75.
] But Udbhata who always follows Bhamaha seems to have
intentionally abandoned him here. Bhamaha has attempt-
ed no divisions of af. But we have seen that Udbhata
does so though his divisions are not so scientific and exact
as those of Mammata. Mammata has 24 divisions in all.
See the passage partially quoted above from
pp. 646-47.
X
P.40, L. 24-啶掂た啶�啶距さ啶ㄠ�� 啷� [vibh膩van膩 | ] This figure and 啶掂た啶多�囙し啷嬥�曕�嵿い啶� [惫颈艣别峁�o办迟颈 ] are
complements of each other and they are consecutively
treated by modern Rhetoricians like 啶班�佮く啷嵿く啶�, 啶�啶�啷嵿ぎ啶�, 啶呧お啷嵿お啶�啶︵��啶曕�嵿し啶苦��,
[ruyyaka, mamma峁璦, appayad墨k峁�ita,
] and others. But the old order of generally
accepted by Bhamaha, Udbhata, Dandin and others seems
to have followed no scientific principle.
DOG
P. 40, LL. 25, 26 - 啶曕�嵿ぐ啶苦く啶距く啶距�� 啶�啷嵿ぐ啶むた啶粪�囙ぇ啷� 啶�啶� [kriy膩y膩岣� prati峁�edhe y膩 ] 1 "The dis
playing of the result [of any action] while the action (i. e.
the cause) itself is denied, is to be regarded as fa
satisfaction (as to how the result took place) is easily
obtained.
when