Significance of Sound reasoning
Sound reasoning is a crucial concept across various traditions, including Tibetan Buddhism, Vaishnavism, Vedanta, and Dharmashastra. In Tibetan Buddhism, it emphasizes logical and valid arguments, while Vaishnavism focuses on the justification behind conclusions to support understanding. Vedanta presents sound reasoning as logical thinking that may challenge certain doctrines, and Dharmashastra highlights its importance in interpreting Vedic texts correctly. Overall, sound reasoning is regarded as essential for coherent understanding and application within these philosophical frameworks.
Synonyms: Logical reasoning, Rational thought, Sound judgment, Valid reasoning, Clear reasoning, Logical thinking
In Dutch: Gezond redeneren; In Finnish: Hyvä perustelu; In Spanish: Razonamiento sólido; In German: Gute Argumentation
The below excerpts are indicatory and do represent direct quotations or translations. It is your responsibility to fact check each reference.
Buddhist concept of 'Sound reasoning'
Sound reasoning in Buddhism signifies the use of logical, coherent arguments that are well-founded. However, even sound reasoning may not always be effective in every situation, highlighting the complexity of communication and understanding in Buddhist practice.
From: Tattvasangraha [with commentary]
(1) Refers to logical and valid arguments that are coherent and well-founded, which despite their quality, may still be ineffective in certain scenarios.[1]
Hindu concept of 'Sound reasoning'
Sound reasoning in Hinduism emphasizes logical evaluation of Upanishadic assertions, valid interpretation of Vedic texts, and rational thinking that may challenge doctrines, thereby underpinning individual understanding and justification of beliefs.
From: Brahma Sutras (Ramanuja)
(1) Logical thinking based on facts and rigorous argumentation that leads to valid conclusions.[2] (2) Logical and rational thinking that conflicts with certain doctrines, leading to their rejection.[3]
From: Kena Upanishad with Shankara’s Commentary
(1) A logical basis for the assertions made by the preceptor regarding the Upanishad and the disciple's understanding.[4]
From: Brahma Sutras (Shankara Bhashya)
(1) While some forms of reasoning can be correct, they must be appropriately applied to avoid defects relevant to the subject matter.[5]
From: Brihad Bhagavatamrita (commentary)
(1) A measure of understanding that can be restricted by the effect of the inferior potency, leading to limitations in knowledge.[6] (2) Logical thinking or justification behind a conclusion, often employed to support one's understanding or perspective.[7]
From: Harivamsha Purana
(1) Wise counsel provided by Bhishma’s ministers to avoid unnecessary conflicts.[8] (2) Vishnu’s insightful and logical approach to addressing the concerns of the gods and assisting them in their troubles.[9]
From: Manusmriti with the Commentary of Medhatithi
(1) The application of valid logic and inference when interpreting Vedic texts and rituals, as opposed to flawed or unsound reasoning.[10]