Significance of Schools of thought
Schools of thought encompass various philosophical and religious traditions that influence beliefs, practices, and intellectual exchanges across different disciplines. In South Asia, they include frameworks from the Purana, Vyakarana, and Vedanta, each addressing themes such as language interpretation and the nature of Atman. Dharmashastra presents teachings on Vedic study regulations, while literary criticism in Indian history showcases shared methodologies among intellectuals. Furthermore, Krishnamurti critiques these systems, arguing they promote division and lack genuine validity.
In Dutch: Scholen van denken; In Finnish: Ajatuksen koulut; In Spanish: Escuelas de pensamiento; In German: Denkschulen
The below excerpts are indicatory and do represent direct quotations or translations. It is your responsibility to fact check each reference.
Hindu concept of 'Schools of thought'
Schools of thought in Hinduism encompass various academic traditions and philosophical perspectives, shaping the understanding of concepts like Atman and language, alongside established theories guiding beliefs, practices, and interpretations of sacred texts.
From: Mandukya Upanishad
(1) Different philosophical or theoretical frameworks that may hold varying beliefs about origination and existence, which are not researched in the text.[1] (2) Established theories or philosophies that reflect a structured approach to understanding a particular subject or idea.[2]
From: Mandukya Upanishad (Gaudapa Karika and Shankara Bhashya)
(1) Different philosophical perspectives that have varying beliefs about the nature of Atman, particularly its existence and birth.[3]
From: Gautama Dharmasutra
(1) Various teachings that outline specific rules regarding the stoppage of Vedic reading and study.[4]
The concept of Schools of thought in local and regional sources
The keyphrase "Schools of thought" encompasses various philosophical frameworks, traditions, and methodologies, highlighting intellectual exchanges in religious contexts, literary criticism, and critiques by thinkers like Krishnamurti on the limitations of established frameworks.
From: Triveni Journal
(1) Existentialism opposes all of these that seek to resolve man into a number of functions.[5] (2) Groups of intellectuals or critics who share common ideas and methodologies in literary criticism.[6] (3) Various philosophical frameworks outlined in the 'Yasastilaka,' particularly related to salvation theories.[7] (4) Systems or frameworks of thinking which Krishnamurti critiques as being imitative and lacking validity, suggesting they encourage division and vanity.[8]
From: Buddhist records of the Western world (Xuanzang)
(1) Various philosophical or religious traditions that priests engage with, signifying intellectual exchanges.[9]