365bet娱乐

1. 'And in case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu is guilty of a number of Sa峁僩h膩disesa offences鈥攄efinite, and not definite鈥攐f one designation, and of various designations鈥攕imilar to each other, and dissimilar鈥攃onnected with each other, and disconnected^[1]. He asks the 厂补峁僩丑补 for an inclusive probation on account of those offences^[2]. The 厂补峁僩丑补 imposes upon him an inclusive probation on account of those offences. He undergoing that probation is guilty meanwhile of a number of Sa峁僩h膩disesa offences, definite ones, which he does not conceal. He asks the 厂补峁僩丑补 to throw him back on account of those intervening offences to the commencement (of his term of probation). The 厂补峁僩丑补 [does so] by a lawful proceeding that cannot be quashed^[3], and fit for the occasion; and it also imposes a 惭腻苍补迟迟补 upon him, but by an unlawful proceeding, and then by an unlawful proceeding rehabilitates him. That Bhikkhu, O Bhikkhus, is not purified from those offences.

And in case, O Bhikkhus, a Bhikkhu is guilty of a number of Sa峁僩h膩disesa offences鈥攄efinite, and not definite鈥攐f one designation, and of various designations鈥攕imilar to each other, and dissimilar鈥攃onnected with each other, and disconnected. And he asks the 厂补峁僩丑补 for an inclusive probation on account of those offences. The 厂补峁僩丑补 imposes upon him an inclusive probation on account of those offences. He undergoing that probation is guilty meanwhile of a number of Sa峁僩h膩disesa offences, definite ones, which he does conceal. He asks the 厂补峁僩丑补 to throw him back on account of those intervening offences to the commencement (of his term of probation). The 厂补峁僩丑补 [does so] by a lawful proceeding that cannot be quashed, and fit for the occasion; and it also imposes upon him an inclusive probation by a lawful proceeding, and imposes upon him a 惭腻苍补迟迟补, but by an unlawful proceeding, and by an unlawful proceeding it rehabilitates him. That Bhikkhu, O Bhikkhus, is not purified from those offences.'

[The same decision is given if, of the intervening offences, all of which are definite, some have been concealed, and some not concealed.]

2. [The same if the intervening offences have been not definite and not concealed, or not definite and concealed, or all not definite but some concealed and some not concealed, or, all not concealed but some definite and some not definite, or all concealed but some definite and some not definite, or some definite and some not definite and some concealed and some not concealed.]

__________________

Here end the nine principal cases (which serve as
a basis for the variations in the following
chapter) in which a Bhikkhu is not
purified (by undergoing a
term of probation).

Footnotes and references:

[back to top]

[1]:

See chap. 33 for this list.

[2]:

In accordance with the rule laid down in chap. 28, which shows that by 'a Bhikkhu' must be understood 'a Bhikkhu who is under probation;' and the offences he has committed must have been concealed by him.

[3]:

Akuppa. The technical term kamma峁� kopeti is not to revoke the valid decision of a kamma regularly held, but to show that the kamma by reason of some irregularity was no real kamma, and its whole proceedings therefore void. One may compare akupp膩 me ceto-vimutti spoken by the Buddha immediately after he had attained Nirv膩峁嘺 under the Bo Tree (Ariyapariyos膩na Sutta in H. O.'s 'Buddha,' p. 429) and the opposite idea in Sutta Nip膩ta IV, 3, 5.